Abstract

Immunology. Why does it exist? Two words. Cure disease. People get diseases. “Test tubes” do not. People fund immunologists for solutions to their health problems. But, immunologists often study leukocytes in test tubes – the laboratory – away from diseases. Why? Because much can be learned from analyzing cellular biochemistry and behaviors in vitro that cannot be ascertained when leukocytes are in animals. At the same time, isolated leukocyte reactions often do not reflect how the immune system operates as a unit. So, it is critical to verify in vitro observations in vivo. Among leukocytes, macrophages are the central initiating and directing element in immune systems, and serve this role through four basic “SHIP” functions in vivo: Sample; Heal; Inhibit; and Present (antigen) (1–4). The polar-opposite functions of Heal (M2-type) and Inhibit (M1-type) can have profoundly different effects on host survival, and require unique and major changes in macrophage metabolism and physiology. In turn, macrophage populations are necessarily heterogeneous as they adapt to protect hosts in different ways: they exhibit “plasticity.” Some have focused on measuring ever-expanding lists of cell surface or various other “markers” (mostly in vitro) to try and sub-type macrophages. But, the “heterogeneity” created by such studies can be “illusory” because there are many more markers than there are functions (e.g., M1/inhibit and M2/heal). Thus, it is important to focus on classifying macrophages by functions, such as SHIP, to navigate through a “sea of plasticity.” And, thereby realize the enormous potential of macrophages/innate immunity for improving health.

Highlights

  • Rather than relying on “markers” or selected culture stimuli to try and define different macrophage “activation” states [59], it seems prudent to focus on characterizing macrophages by their known in vivo functions, such as SHIP [1]

  • If a population of resting/resident macrophages receives appropriate signals (e.g., LPS and/or IFN-γ) and commits to switching from M2/heal to M1/inhibit dominant activity, it takes the cell(s) several hours to accomplish this major change in metabolism

  • Analysis of whole populations can create the additional illusion that M1-type have converted back to M2type, when they are dead/missing [1] In turn, examining macrophage populations can create impressions of reversible plasticity or heterogeneity, but which are not based on what functions the macrophages have (e.g., M1/inhibit or M2/heal) [49]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Macrophages are the central initiating and directing element in immune systems, and serve this role through four basic “SHIP” functions in vivo: Sample; Heal; Inhibit; and Present (antigen) [1,2,3,4]. The polar-opposite functions of Heal (M2type) and Inhibit (M1-type) can have profoundly different effects on host survival, and require unique and major changes in macrophage metabolism and physiology.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.