Abstract
Abstract In an earlier work a rotating crystal diagram, three different Schiebold-Sauter (rotating goniometer) equatorial diagrams and two different photomicrographs of the same sample of a single crystal were described and shown to be conclusive proof of the single-crystal texture of the sample under examination. If, in their work on the same subject, Meyer and Mark had likewise taken numerous photographs of different kinds, instead of a single photographic film, a comparison of the various photographs would speak for itself. In taking his rotating crystal goniometric photographs, the present author used uniformly thick, frozen small cubes of rubber, the intensities in the reflections of which were the same in all directions. On the contrary, in the photographs of Meyer and Mark, a stretched film of rubber, which reflected considerably less uniformly than did the samples used by the present author, was photographed at rest and therefore without being rotated. Although Meyer and Mark agree to the interference 300, they maintain that this does not explain in any way the appearance of reflection A2.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.