Machine learning‐based tri‐stage classification of Alzheimer's progressive neurodegenerative disease usingPCAandmRMRadministered textural, orientational, and spatial features

Decision letter: Stage-dependent differential influence of metabolic and structural networks on memory across Alzheimer’s disease continuum

Battle against Alzheimer's Disease: The Scope and Potential Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers

Reducing variations in multi-center Alzheimer's disease classification with convolutional adversarial autoencoder.

Search for Clinical Markers Could? Transform Alzheimer's Drug Research

Background/Objectives: This study presents a comparative analysis of the multistage diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including mild cognitive impairment (MCI), utilizing two distinct types of biomarkers: blood gene expression and clinical biomarker samples. Both of these samples, obtained from participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), were independently analyzed utilizing machine learning (ML)-based multiclassifiers. This study applied novel machine learning-based data augmentation techniques to gene expression profile data that are high-dimensional, low-sample-size (HDLSS) and inherently highly imbalanced. The investigation obtained the highest multiclassification performance to date in the multistage diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease utilizing the blood gene expression profiles of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants. Based on the performance results obtained, and other factors such as early prediction capabilities, this study compares the efficacies of the two types of biomarkers for multistage diagnosis. This study presents the sole investigation in which multiclassification-based AD stage diagnosis was conducted utilizing blood gene expression data. We obtained the best multiclassification result in both modalities of the ADNI data in terms of F1-score and were able to identify new genetic biomarkers. Methods: The combination of the XGBoost and SFBS (Sequential Floating Backward Selection) methods was used to select the features. We were able to select the 95 most effective gene probe sets out of 49,386. For the clinical study data, eight of the most effective biomarkers were selected using SFBS. A deep learning (DL) classifier was used to identify the stages-cognitive normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD)/dementia. DL, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting (GB), and random forest (RF) classifiers were used for the AD stage detection from gene expression profile data. Because of the high data imbalance in genomic data, borderline oversampling/data augmentation was applied in the model training and original samples for validation. Results: Utilizing clinical data, the highest ROC AUC scores attained were 0.989, 0.927, and 0.907 for the identification of the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively. The highest F1 scores achieved were 0.971, 0.939, and 0.886. Employing gene expression data, we obtained ROC AUC scores of 0.763, 0.761, and 0.706 for the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively, and F1 scores of 0.71, 0.77, and 0.53 for CN, MCI, and dementia, respectively. Conclusions: This represents the best outcome to date for AD stage diagnosis from ADNI blood gene expression profile data utilizing multiclassification techniques. The results indicated that our multiclassification model effectively manages the imbalanced data of a high-dimension, low-sample-size (HDLSS) nature to identify samples of the minority class. MAPK14, PLG, FZD2, FXYD6, and TEP1 are among the novel genes identified as being associated with AD risk.

ABSTRACTMultimodal neuroimaging, combining data from different sources, has shown promise in the classification of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) stage. Existing multimodal neuroimaging fusion methods exhibit certain limitations, which require advancements to enhance their objective performance, sensitivity, and specificity for AD classification. This study uses the use of a Pareto‐optimal cosine color map to enhance classification performance and visual clarity of fused images. A mobile vision transformer (ViT) model, incorporating the swish activation function, is introduced for effective feature extraction and classification. Fused images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the Whole Brain Atlas (AANLIB), and Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) datasets, obtained through optimized transposed convolution, are utilized for model training, while evaluation is achieved using images that have not been fused from the same databases. The proposed model demonstrates high accuracy in AD classification across different datasets, achieving 98.76% accuracy for Early Mild Cognitive Impairment (EMCI) versus LMCI, 98.65% for Late Mild Cognitive Impairment (LMCI) versus AD, 98.60% for EMCI versus AD, and 99.25% for AD versus Cognitive Normal (CN) in the ADNI dataset. Similarly, on OASIS and AANLIB, the precision of the AD versus CN classification is 99.50% and 96.00%, respectively. Evaluation metrics showcase the model's precision, recall, and F1 score for various binary classifications, emphasizing its robust performance.

Latent diffusion model-based MRI superresolution enhances mild cognitive impairment prognostication and Alzheimer's disease classification

Accurate prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia onset and progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial for early intervention and clinical trial design. This study presents a predictive framework leveraging Bayesian model averaging (BMA) with a multivariate functional mixed model (MFMM) to integrate multivariate longitudinal outcomes and survival data. The training cohort included 1012 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The validation cohort comprised 2087 participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). BMA methods, including stacking and pseudo-BMA+, aggregated predictions across candidate models to enhance accuracy and robustness. Predictive performance was evaluated using the C-index, a measure of discrimination. Compared to the composite model, BMA improved prediction accuracy. The C-index was 0.777 (stacking) and 0.771 (pseudo-BMA+) in ADNI and 0.743 and 0.738 in NACC. This framework offers a robust tool for personalized medicine, enabling accurate predictions and enhanced generalizability across diverse populations. We introduced a novel joint modeling framework integrating multivariate longitudinal outcomes (Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes) with survival data to predict Alzheimer's disease dementia onset and progression. We validated the framework across complementary datasets: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (training) and National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC; validation), with NACC providing a demographically diverse population to assess generalizability. The model enhanced predictive accuracy using Bayesian model averaging, which synthesizes insights across multiple models to reduce uncertainty and improve robustness. The model demonstrated consistent and clinically relevant performance, supporting its applicability for early intervention, precision medicine, and clinical trial design.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), including its mild cognitive impairment (MCI) phase that may or may not progress into the AD, is the most ordinary form of dementia. It is extremely important to correctly identify patients during the MCI stage because this is the phase where AD may or may not develop. Thus, it is crucial to predict outcomes during this phase. Thus far, many researchers have worked on only using a single modality of a biomarker for the diagnosis of AD or MCI. Although recent studies show that a combination of one or more different biomarkers may provide complementary information for the diagnosis, it also increases the classification accuracy distinguishing between different groups. In this paper, we propose a novel machine learning-based framework to discriminate subjects with AD or MCI utilizing a combination of four different biomarkers: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels, and Apolipoprotein-E (APOE) genotype. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) baseline dataset was used in this study. In total, there were 158 subjects for whom all four modalities of biomarker were available. Of the 158 subjects, 38 subjects were in the AD group, 82 subjects were in MCI groups (including 46 in MCIc [MCI converted; conversion to AD within 24 months of time period], and 36 in MCIs [MCI stable; no conversion to AD within 24 months of time period]), and the remaining 38 subjects were in the healthy control (HC) group. For each image, we extracted 246 regions of interest (as features) using the Brainnetome template image and NiftyReg toolbox, and later we combined these features with three CSF and two APOE genotype features obtained from the ADNI website for each subject using early fusion technique. Here, a different kernel-based multiclass support vector machine (SVM) classifier with a grid-search method was applied. Before passing the obtained features to the classifier, we have used truncated singular value decomposition (Truncated SVD) dimensionality reduction technique to reduce high dimensional features into a lower-dimensional feature. As a result, our combined method achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AU-ROC) curve of 98.33, 93.59, 96.83, 94.64, 96.43, and 95.24% for AD vs. HC, MCIs vs. MCIc, AD vs. MCIs, AD vs. MCIc, HC vs. MCIc, and HC vs. MCIs subjects which are high relative to single modality results and other state-of-the-art approaches. Moreover, combined multimodal methods have improved the classification performance over the unimodal classification.

Brain network plays an important role in representing abnormalities in Alzheimers disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which includes MCIc (MCI converted to AD) and MCInc (MCI not converted to AD). In our previous study, we proposed an AD classification approach based on individual hierarchical networks constructed with 3D texture features of brain images. However, we only used edge features of the networks without node features of the networks. In this paper, we propose a framework of the combination of multiple kernels to combine edge features and node features for AD classification. An evaluation of the proposed approach has been conducted with MRI images of 710 subjects (230 health controls (HC), 280 MCI (including 120 MCIc and 160 MCInc), and 200 AD) from the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative database by using ten-fold cross validation. Experimental results show that the proposed method is not only superior to the existing AD classification methods, but also efficient and promising for clinical applications for the diagnosis of AD via MRI images. Furthermore, the results also indicate that 3D texture could detect the subtle texture differences between tissues in AD, MCI, and HC, and texture features of MRI images might be related to the severity of AD cognitive impairment. These results suggest that 3D texture is a useful aid in AD diagnosis.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOM TRAJECTORY AND PROGRESSION TO ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

¹⁸F-FDFG uptake by brain tissue as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-established method for assessment of brain function in people with dementia. Certain findings on brain PET scans can potentially predict the decline of mild cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease dementia or other dementias. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET index test for detecting people with MCI at baseline who would clinically convert to Alzheimer's disease dementia or other forms of dementia at follow-up. We searched the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, PsycINFO, BIOSIS previews, LILACS, MEDION, (Meta-analyses van Diagnostisch Onderzoek), DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects), HTA (Health Technology Assessment Database), ARIF (Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility) and C-EBLM (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee for Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine) databases to January 2013. We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews for additional studies. We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET to determine the conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia or to other forms of dementia, i.e. any or all of vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and fronto-temporal dementia. These studies necessarily employ delayed verification of conversion to dementia and are sometimes labelled as 'delayed verification cross-sectional studies'. Two blinded review authors independently extracted data, resolving disagreement by discussion, with the option to involve a third review author as arbiter if necessary. We extracted and summarised graphically the data for two-by-two tables. We conducted exploratory analyses by plotting estimates of sensitivity and specificity from each study on forest plots and in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space. When studies had mixed thresholds, we derived estimates of sensitivity and likelihood ratios at fixed values (lower quartile, median and upper quartile) of specificity from the hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) models. We included 14 studies (421 participants) in the analysis. The sensitivities for conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia were between 25% and 100% while the specificities were between 15% and 100%. From the summary ROC curve we fitted we estimated that the sensitivity was 76% (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.8 to 89.7) at the included study median specificity of 82%. This equates to a positive likelihood ratio of 4.03 (95% CI: 2.97 to 5.47), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.75). Three studies recruited participants from the same Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort but only the largest ADNI study (Herholz 2011) is included in the meta-analysis. In order to demonstrate whether the choice of ADNI study or discriminating brain region (Chételat 2003) or reader assessment (Pardo 2010) make a difference to the pooled estimate, we performed five additional analyses. At the median specificity of 82%, the estimated sensitivity was between 74% and 76%. There was no impact on our findings. In addition to evaluating Alzheimer's disease dementia, five studies evaluated the accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for all types of dementia. The sensitivities were between 46% and 95% while the specificities were between 29% and 100%; however, we did not conduct a meta-analysis because of too few studies, and those studies which we had found recruited small numbers of participants. Our findings are based on studies with poor reporting, and the majority of included studies had an unclear risk of bias, mainly for the reference standard and participant selection domains. According to the assessment of Index test domain, more than 50% of studies were of poor methodological quality. It is difficult to determine to what extent the findings from the meta-analysis can be applied to clinical practice. Given the considerable variability of specificity values and lack of defined thresholds for determination of test positivity in the included studies, the current evidence does not support the routine use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans in clinical practice in people with MCI. The ¹⁸F-FDG PET scan is a high-cost investigation, and it is therefore important to clearly demonstrate its accuracy and to standardise the process of ¹⁸F-FDG PET diagnostic modality prior to its being widely used. Future studies with more uniform approaches to thresholds, analysis and study conduct may provide a more homogeneous estimate than the one available from the included studies we have identified.

VALIDATING NON-AMYLOID, NON-TAU CSF BIOMARKERS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE IN THE PRE-SYMPTOMATIC, MCI, AND DEMENTIA STAGES: A MULTI-CENTER STUDY

Accurate classification of either patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of AD, from cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals is important for clinical diagnosis and adequate intervention. The current study focused on distinguishing AD or MCI from CU based on the multi-feature kernel supervised within-Class-similar discriminative dictionary learning algorithm (MKSCDDL), which we introduced in a previous study, demonstrating that MKSCDDL had superior performance in face recognition. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and florbetapir-PET data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were all included for classification of AD vs. CU, MCI vs. CU, as well as AD vs. MCI (113 AD patients, 110 MCI patients, and 117 CU subjects). By adopting MKSCDDL, we achieved a classification accuracy of 98.18% for AD vs. CU, 78.50% for MCI vs. CU, and 74.47% for AD vs. MCI, which in each instance was superior to results obtained using several other state-of-the-art approaches (MKL, JRC, mSRC, and mSCDDL). In addition, testing time results outperformed other high quality methods. Therefore, the results suggested that the MKSCDDL procedure is a promising tool for assisting early diagnosis of diseases using neuroimaging data.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an incurable neurodegenerative disorder accounting for 70%-80% dementia cases worldwide. Although, research on AD has increased in recent years, however, the complexity associated with brain structure and functions makes the early diagnosis of this disease a challenging task. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is a neuroimaging technology that has been widely used to study the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. In literature, the computer-aided diagnosis of AD is limited to binary classification or diagnosis of AD and MCI stages. However, its applicability to diagnose multiple progressive stages of AD is relatively under-studied. This study explores the effectiveness of rs-fMRI for multi-class classification of AD and its associated stages including CN, SMC, EMCI, MCI, LMCI, and AD. A longitudinal cohort of resting-state fMRI of 138 subjects (25 CN, 25 SMC, 25 EMCI, 25 LMCI, 13 MCI, and 25AD) from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is studied. To provide a better insight into deep learning approaches and their applications to AD classification, we investigate ResNet-18 architecture in detail. We consider the training of the network from scratch by using single-channel input as well as performed transfer learning with and without fine-tuning using an extended network architecture. We experimented with residual neural networks to perform AD classification task and compared it with former research in this domain. The performance of the models is evaluated using precision, recall, f1-measure, AUC and ROC curves. We found that our networks were able to significantly classify the subjects. We achieved improved results with our fine-tuned model for all the AD stages with an accuracy of 100%, 96.85%, 97.38%, 97.43%, 97.40% and 98.01% for CN, SMC, EMCI, LMCI, MCI, and AD respectively. However, in terms of overall performance, we achieved state-of-the-art results with an average accuracy of 97.92% and 97.88% for off-the-shelf and fine-tuned models respectively. The Analysis of results indicate that classification and prediction of neurodegenerative brain disorders such as AD using functional magnetic resonance imaging and advanced deep learning methods is promising for clinical decision making and have the potential to assist in early diagnosis of AD and its associated stages.