Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Due To Spodylolisthesis- Surgical Compared With Nonsurgical Treatment

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis stands for severe pain and dysfunction because of the narrowing of the spinal canal and vertebral slip. With patients being treated either surgically or by other methods, distinction between the two is necessary to resolve controversies. Objectives: To conduct a comparative analysis between surgery and non-surgery in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis using observational and randomized control study groups. Study Design: A Observational and randomized cohort comparative study Place and duration of study : department of neurosurgery lady reading hospital Peshawar from jan-2020 to jan-2023 Methods: Based on the observational and randomized cohort study conducted in the period jan-2020 to jan-2023 in the Lady Reading Hospital, 604 patients were included in the study. Collectively, treatment embraced either surgical untethering or other mean. Specific patient outcomes such as pain relief and functional gain were measured during the follow-up which ranged up to 3 years. Results: In terms of body pain, surgical intervention provided statistically significant and more superior results in a mean of 18. 1 as compared to nonsurgical management over 3 years of follow up, similarly for physical functions the mean improvement was of 18. 3 and for Oswestry Disability Index it was 16. 7. Conclusion: The decision of preferring surgical intervention for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis correspond to the maximum long term advantages of surgical over non surgical treatment principles focusing on the pain relief and functional recovery. Therefore, the present outcomes favour surgical management as the most preferred treatment approach with the adoption of individualised management plans following thorough clinical examinations of the patients. Keywords: Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis , Surgery Outcomes