Abstract

Summary The risk of blood-borne diseases has substantially increased the use of autologous blood transfusion. Many autologous donors, however, still need homologous transfusions. To find out whether recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO) reduces requirements for homologous blood transfusion, we carried out a randomised, controlled trial, in which patients were stratified according to blood volume. We studied 95 autologous blood donors undergoing elective hip surgery. 50 patients were randomly assigned 500 U/kg rhEPO subcutaneously twice a week for 3 weeks, and 45 patients received no treatment (control group). The patients each donated two units of blood before surgery. Only 5 (10%) rhEPO-treated patients received homologous transfusions compared with 16 (36%) controls (p<0·01). rhEPO was most useful in patients with a blood volume below 4 L and an estimated blood loss below 2 L or with a blood volume of 4-5 L and blood loss of 1-2 L. Continued administration of rhEPO caused no further increase in reticulocyte counts after the fourth injection, which was accompanied by a pronounced depletion of storage iron. rhEPO treatment had no effect on renal function, platelet count, or blood pressure. Subcutaneous rhEPO is an effective and safe way to reduce exposure to homologous blood in autologous donors. Its use can be restricted to a subpopulation of autologous blood donors, which improves the cost-effectiveness of this expensive approach.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.