Abstract
This paper deals with inflectional change in Germanic standard and non-standard varieties, challenging the standard model of phonologically driven case loss in favour of a model that allows for interaction between phonological, syntactic, and purely morphological processes. After providing evidence from the language histories of the modern, standardised varieties of High German and Swedish which calls into question the exclusive role of phonology, we concentrate on two Germanic non-standard varieties: Visperterminen Alemannic, a successor of Old High German, and Övdalian, which stems from Old Dalecarlian (Old Swedish is used as a proxy to Old Dalecarlian). Both can serve as a testing ground for system-internal morphological change, as they carry on specific phonological aspects of their ancestral varieties, and have not been subject to excessive language contact that could have triggered external simplification processes. Using these non-standard varieties as an empirical base, we examine the patterns of loss of inflectional case marking and corresponding compensation strategies on the level of the nominal phrase. It can be shown that, while there are extensive syncretisms in noun inflection, these are systematically compensated for in the noun phrase for dative, but not for the nominative-accusative syncretism. The systematic (non-)compensation in the noun phrase can be explained by word order. Based on our results, we propose an alternative model for morphological change in Germanic that is less prone to counterevidence from non-standard varieties.
Highlights
The aim of this paper is to examine the loss of inflectional case markings and strategies of compensating for them on the level of the NP in two highly inflecting non-standard varieties of the Germanic dialect continuum
To control for these possible effects, we concentrate on two non-standard Germanic varieties in Section 3 that can serve as a testing ground far better suited to the question at hand: Visperterminen Alemannic (VA), a German variety spoken in the Swiss Alps, and Övdalian (Ö), a Dalecarlian variety spoken by a small language community in northern Dalarna in western Sweden
We examine which cases are syncretised in the noun inflection, and which of these syncretisms are compensated for by case marking on the articles and/or adjectives
Summary
The aim of this paper is to examine the loss of inflectional case markings and strategies of compensating for them on the level of the NP in two highly inflecting non-standard varieties of the Germanic dialect continuum. Standard German and Standard Swedish are highly affected by language contact; especially Standard German shows a radically reduced vocalism in unstressed syllables2 – and both of these traits might be catalysts of loss of case To control for these possible effects, we concentrate on two non-standard Germanic varieties in Section 3 that can serve as a testing ground far better suited to the question at hand: Visperterminen Alemannic (VA), a German variety spoken in the Swiss Alps, and Övdalian (Ö), a Dalecarlian variety spoken by a small language community in northern Dalarna in western Sweden. We intertwine the alternative, more resilient explanations for parts of the overall change process (using the varieties we focus on subsequently in Section 3) to further substantiate the notion of a complex interplay of various factors
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
