Abstract

The establishment of a constitutional democracy in South Africa necessitated widespread institutional reforms across state sectors. A key feature of such reforms was the emphasis on oversight and accountability as illustrated in reform endeavours pursued in the South African Police Service, courts and prisons. One such oversight mechanism – the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (JICS) – is the subject of this article. Drawing on qualitative interviews with people closely involved with the JICS since 1998, this article presents ‘insider views’ regarding the JICS. We conclude with incumbents’ views on the effectiveness of the JICS.

Highlights

  • Under apartheid, South African prisons bore the imprint of racialised and repressive rule

  • The office is headed up by an Inspecting Judge (IJ), who is assisted by a Chief Executive Officer (CEO), under whom are three units: the support services directorate, the legal services directorate, and the management regions directorate

  • The Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (JICS) has been highly critical of the Department of Correctional Services (DCS), its recommendations and findings have been largely disregarded by the DCS

Read more

Summary

Insider views on the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services

The establishment of a constitutional democracy in South Africa necessitated widespread institutional reforms across state sectors. A key feature of such reforms was the emphasis on oversight and accountability as illustrated in reform endeavours pursued in the South African Police Service, courts and prisons. One such oversight mechanism – the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (JICS) – is the subject of this article. The role of the ICCV is to regularly visit correctional centres, interview inmates and record complaints, and attempt to resolve complaints with the DCS where possible, submitting unresolved complaints to the IJ and writing monthly reports to be submitted to the IJ’s office.[10] Visitors Committees (VC) are established to deal with unresolved complaints, schedule visits to correctional facilities, and engage with community leaders. How do those situated at the upper echelons of the JICS reflect on the mandate, role, achievements and challenges of this oversight mechanism?

Research methods
Key features of prisons past and present
The birth of the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services
Critical components of the Judicial Inspectorate
The Inspecting Judge
Independent Correctional Centre Visitors
Electronic systems
Changes in the mandate and role of the JICS
Views on the removal of the corruption clause
The elusive search for independence
Bureaucratisation of systems and processes
The contribution of the JICS in the greater scheme of things
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.