Abstract

Detailed comparisons are made between long-time numerical integration of the motion of four identical point vortices obtained using both a fourth-order symplectic integration method of the implicit Runge-Kutta type and a standard fourth-order explicit Runge-Kutta scheme. We utilize the reduced hamiltonian formulation of the four-vortex problem due to Aref & Pomphrey. Initial conditions which give both fully chaotic and also quasi-periodic motions are considered over integration times of order 10 6 -10 7 times the characteristic time scale of the evolution. The convergence, as the integration time step is decreased, of the Poincaré section is investigated. When smoothness of the section compared to the converged image, and the fractional change in the hamiltonian H are used as diagnostic indicators, it is found that the symplectic scheme gives substantially superior performance over the explicit scheme, and exhibits only an apparent qualitative degrading in results up to integration time steps of order the minimum timescale of the evolution. It is concluded that this performance derives from the symplectic rather than the implicit character of the method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.