Abstract

Letters15 June 1995Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Lyme DiseaseDavid L. KatzDavid L. KatzSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-12-199506150-00017 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:An apparent inconsistency exists in the data reported by Shadick and colleagues [1] in their retrospective cohort study of Lyme disease. The abstract notes neurocognitive impairment in four patients with a history of Lyme borreliosis. In the text, the authors report that 12 cases and only 5 controls scored more than 2 standard deviations from the mean on two or more memory tests. Finally, in Table 5, these figures are reversed, suggesting more abnormal results among controls. Perhaps these data are consistent and I have misinterpreted them, but, if so, others may also have done so. I ...REFERENCE1. Shadick NA, Phillips CB, Logigian EL, Steere AC, Kaplan RF, Berardi VP, et al. The long-term clinical outcomes of Lyme disease. A population-based retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:560-7. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 15 June 1995Volume 122, Issue 12Page: 960-962KeywordsCohort studiesFearInfectious diseasesInformation storage and retrievalLyme diseaseMemoryPainResearch designStandard deviationStatistical data Issue Published: 15 June 1995 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1995 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.