Abstract

To determine and compare the clinical and immunologic outcomes for HIV-infected women initiated on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with and without previous exposure to single-dose nevirapine in the MTCT-Plus programme - Kampala, Uganda, from 2003 to 2011. Retrospective comparison of prospectively collected programmatic data of clinical and immunologic treatment outcomes among HIV-infected Ugandan women, with and without prior exposure to sdNVP, who received NNRTI-based ART for a median follow-up of 6years. Of the 408 women in the programme, 289 (70.8%) were started on ART, of whom 205 (70.9%) had prior exposure to sdNVP. Clinical, immunologic and combined (clinical and or immunologic) treatment failure occurred in 29 (10.0%), 132 (45.7%) and 142 (49.1%) women, respectively. There was no significant difference in the distribution of time to immunologic failure for women by exposure to sdNVP (log-rank P=0.98). In Cox proportional hazard modelling, exposure to sdNVP was not associated with immunologic failure [adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-1.30]. CD4 count >100cells/mm(3) at initiation was associated with reduced incidence of immunologic failure in adjusted analyses (HR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48). HIV-infected Ugandan women initiated on an NVP-based ART regimen had similar immunologic treatment outcomes irrespective of previous NVP exposure. CD4 cell count prior to initiating HAART was a key prognostic factor for successful long-term immunologic treatment outcomes. In poor settings, regular follow-up of patients on HAART with adequate counselling to promote adherence and safe disclosure may promote low clinical failure rates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.