Abstract
The need for age-related normative data on neuropsychological measures is clearly important. This longitudinal study examines a “normal” elderly group's performance on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB) across four years. This report is based on the 59 “normal” elderly volunteers seen in an earlier cross-sectional aging study (Maclnnes et al., 1983). The LNNB Clinical Scales exhibited few signiflcant changes across the four year time period. The test-retest correlations of the LNNB Clinical Scales ranged from .32 to .81. Few differences between males and females were seen. Similarly, being in an older subgroup did not affect the rate of change on the LNNB scores. Although, health status changed very little over the four years, health status at Time 2 did significantly predict 16 of the 17 LNNB Clinical Scales at Time 2. In summary, we found the LNNB accurately identifled the “normal” elderly as normal. Similarly, their performance on the LNNB exhibited little meaningful change across four years.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
