Abstract

To determine longitudinal changes in the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness of the fellow eyes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Prospective cohort study. Patients with unilateral neovascular AMD, unilateral polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and control subjects were included. After the initial visit, GC-IPL thickness was measured twice more with at least a 1-year interval between examinations using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Twenty-seven fellow eyes of patients with unilateral choroidal neovascularization (CNV), 33 fellow eyes of patients with unilateral PCV, and 35 eyes of control subjects were enrolled. The GC-IPL thickness of the fellow eyes was 78.41 ± 9.23, 81.20 ± 5.52, and 81.60 ± 3.83μm in the CNV, PCV, and control groups, respectively, and they showed a significant change over time (P< .001, P= .001, and P= .003, respectively). The reduction rate of GC-IPL thickness was-0.88,-0.41, and-0.31μm per year in the fellow eyes of the CNV, PCV, and control groups, respectively (CNV > PCV, control, P < .001). In a linear mixed model determination of factors associated with GC-IPL reduction in the fellow eyes of the CNV group, the interaction between baseline GC-IPL thickness and duration showed a significant result (P < .001). The fellow eyes of patients with neovascular AMD showed a greater reduction rate of GC-IPL thickness compared with fellow eyes of patients with unilateral PCV and control subjects. In patients with unilateral neovascular AMD, fellow eyes with a thicker GC-IPL at baseline showed a greater reduction in GC-IPL thickness over time.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.