Long-term survival benefit of atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment in unresectable HCC patients.

253 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the palliative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC. TACE-induced ischemic injury is known to increase circulating VEGF and related with poor prognosis.The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of combined TACE with sorafenib, VEGFR inhibitor in unresectable HCC patients. Methods: This study is a non-randomized, open-labeld, single-arm, phase II investigator-initiated clinical study. Estimated number of subjects was 50 under the assumption of 3.2 months of median time to progression (TTP) with TACE alone. All patients are Child-Pugh class A or superb B. Sorafenib begins to be administered on 3 days after the first session of TACE and will be subsequently administered up to 24 weeks. Efficacy of TACE was evaluated after 4 weeks from TACE by dynamic CT. Repeated TACE is performed “on demand” in case of PR or SD according to CT/MRI evaluation. Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled for this interim analysis. Male was 84% and mean age was 61.5years. Causes of underlying chronic liver disease were HBV in 28 patients (65.1%). Patients were categorized into modified UICC stage II (15, 30.0%), III (24, 48.0%) and IVA (11, 22.0%). Median follow-up period was 5.3 months (range, 1.0–13.1). The size of index lesions was ranged from 1.0 cm to 13.1 cm, and number of lesions was between 1 and 5. Number of TACE sessions was 1.0 (range, 1–4). Common adverse events (AE) during sorafenib therapy were elevation of serum AST/ALT (96.8%), hypocalcemia (90.0%), thrombocytopenia (84.0%), and hyperbilirubinemia (76.0%). Hand-foot skin reaction was most frequently observed among AE of NCI CTCAE grade 3 or higher (40.0%), followed by elevation of serum ALT (38.0%). Dose reduction of sorafenib was needed most commonly due to hand-food skin reaction (n=29). Median TTP was 5.1 months (range, 3.8–6.3). Conclusions: Adverse events were approved as acceptable by independent monitoring system. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was also observed. This trial can be safely performed with close monitoring in inoperable and/or unresectable HCC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on the prognosis of unresectable HCC patients with portal and/or hepatic vein invasion.MethodsA retrospective analysis of unresectable HCC patients with portal and/or hepatic vein invasion registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) database was performed. The propensity score-matching (PSM) method was used to balance differences between groups. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were the interesting endpoints. OS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death caused by any cause or the last follow-up. CSS was defined as the interval between the date of diagnosis and date of death due only to HCC or last follow-up. OS and CSS were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards model, and Fine-Gray competing-risk model.ResultsA total of 2,614 patients were included. 50.2% patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy and 7.5% patients received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Compared to the untreated group, chemotherapy or radiotherapy (COR) (HR = 0.538, 95% CI 0.495-0.585, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CAR) (HR = 0.371, 95% CI 0.316-0.436, p < 0.001) showed better OS. In the COR group, Cox analysis results showed AFP, tumor size, N stage and M stage were independent risk factor of OS. Competing-risk analysis results showed AFP, tumor size and M stage were independent risk factor of CSS. In the CAR group, AFP and M stage were independent risk factors of OS. Competing-risk analysis results showed M stage were independent risk factor of CSS. Kaplan Meier analysis showed chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy significantly improves OS (10.0 vs. 5.0 months, p < 0.001) and CSS (10.0 vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.006) than monotherapy.ConclusionAFP positive and distant metastasis are the main risk factors affecting OS and CSS of unresectable HCC patients with portal and/or hepatic vein invasion. Chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy significantly improves OS and CSS of unresectable HCC patients with portal and/or hepatic vein invasion.

382 Background: To evaluate the pattern and outcomes of sorafenib use in unresectable/advanced HCC in a real life setting in a tertiary Hong Kong liver cancer centre. Methods: A retrospective review of unresectable or advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from 2010-2015 was conducted. The objectives were to evaluate the sorafenib efficacy in overall treated population as well as different subgroups; and also reviewed the tolerability of sorafenib, especially its impact on liver function. Results: During the study period, 504 consecutive cases were identified and 493 cases with sufficient clinical data were analyzed. Consistent with Asia-Pacific etiologies, 79.3% patients had chronic hepatitis B. Sorafenib was mainly used in patients with high tumor burden (75.1% BCLC-C, 68.6% MVI or/and EHS). Two-third patients (68.2%) were pretreated, mostly with loco-regional therapies . While 70.2% patients had good baseline PS 0, one-quarter (26.6%) had Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis state. The overall survival (OS) was 8.15 months, with no difference between HBV and non-HBV subgroups. Patients had Child-Pugh A(CP-A) had significantly better OS compared with those at CP-B/C (11.1m vs 3.29m vs 3.34m). About 36.1% patients received subsequent therapies. Safety profile was essentially consistent with literature with hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR) being the most common AE (30.7% all-grade). Interestingly, the onset of HFSR was associated with significantly better OS (median: 14.59 vs 5.59 months, p &lt;0.001). Notably, there was no significant change in the on-treatment levels of liver function in terms of bilirubin and plasma albumin level. Conclusions: Our study confirms the efficacy and safety in using sorafenib to treat unresectable or advanced HCC patients in the real life setting. Our results are s comparable with those reported in literature. In addition, we found that 1) similar efficacy in treating HCC regardless of HBV status, 2) positive association of OS with HFSR onset, and 3) no compromised liver function during sorafenib therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in China. Apatinib is a small molecule TKI inhibitor. Its efficacy and safety for unresectable HCC patients have been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical studies. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib in real world is lacking. We are aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in real world.MethodsPatients of older than 18 years with unresectable HCC confirmed by IHC (Immunohistochemistry) or CT and MR Imaging were enrolled in the study. All patients received apatinib monotherapy or combined with other treatments including TACE and chemotherapy. The enrolled patients were treated until disease progression, death, or severe intolerable toxicity, etc. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.ResultsFrom February, 2019 to May, 2020, a total of 233 patients were enrolled. Among them, 66 (28.33%) patients received apatinib monotherapy and 167 (71.67%) patients received combination therapy. Patients with a history of hepatitis accounted for 70%. 8 patients achieved complete response (CR), 64 patients achieved partial response (PR), 120 patients achieved stable disease (SD), and 41 patients had progressive disease (PD), illustrating an ORR of 30.90% and a DCR of 82.40%. Median PFS and OS were 6.93 months (95% CI, 6.19-7.68 months) and 11.36 months (95% CI, 9.96-12.77 months), respectively. The safety profile indicated that the most common drug-related adverse events were hypertension (37.90%), hand-foot-skin reaction (27.39%), fatigue (19.11%), thrombocytopenia (16.02%). Grade 3/4 treatment related AEs included thrombocytopenia (4.30%), hypertension (3.82%), neutropenia (2.73%). After symptomatic treatment, all the adverse events were treated properly, and no unexpected adverse events were observed. Conclusions In current study, apatininb showed good tolerance with acceptable toxicity and high tumor response rate that translated into promising PFS and OS in unresectable HCC patients. ChiCTR1900021822 Citation Format: Jun Liu, Guangbing Li, Qiang He, Shijun Sun, Chuanlin Zhao, Chuandong Sun, Bo Zhang, Yi Cui, Yongqiang Ye, Xuting Zhi, Shiping Li, Shiping Li, Guozheng Pan, Changlin Ma, Jinhua Hu, Jun Li, Suling Wang, Yuangang Qiao, Wanhua Ren, Qi Meng. Efficacy and safety of apatinib in treatment of unresectablehepatocellular carcinoma: A real-world study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5249.

e16654 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) has been used in clinical practice because of its high response rate since administrated in China. However, no recommendation is available as second-line agents after LEN treatment. The combination therapy of anti-programmed death-1(PD1) antibodies with LEN have demonstrated promising clinical efficacy in advanced HCC. Some patients were used this combination treatment after progressed on LEN in real world settings in China. Preclinical studies also showed the immune-moderate effects of LEN. This study was retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of 26 unresectable HCC patients treated with LEN and anti-PD1 antibody after progressed on LEN. Methods: Unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients who treated with the combination of LEN with anti-PD1 antibody after progressed on LEN were enrolled. Patients who combine other loco-treatment and systemic therapy during the LEN combination with PD-1 antibody treatment period were excluded. The efficacy of LEN and anti-PD1 antibody was evaluated by mRECIST criteria after 2 cycles of combination treatment. AE data were recorded during the combination treatment period. Results: From October 2018 to October 2019, 26 patients were finally enrolled. As of January 10, 2020, median follow-up was 6.7±3.19 months. Median age was 56.15±11.9 years old, 80.77% (21/26) was Child-pugh(CP) A while 19.23% (5/26) was CPB7 and 88.5% (23/26) was BCLC stage C. Before combination therapy, 11 patients (42.31%) used LEN only and the other 15 patients (57.69%) were experienced sorafenib/chemotherapy before LEN. Drugs of PD1 antibodies were Keytruda and Toripalimab. The median duration of combination treatment was 6.7±3.15months. The ORR was 26.9% in total 26 cases. 2 cases of them were complete response, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 88.5% (23/26). The most common adverse events (AEs) of combination treatment were hypertension (42.31%), diarrhea (38.46%), hypothyroidism (38.46%) and anorexia (34.62%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 6 (23.08%) patients. Conclusions: This was the first real-world data of sequential therapy of LEN combination with anti-PD1 followed LEN in uHCC patients. For advanced patients who have progressed after LEN treatment, the results were promising, showing high DCR and well tolerated. 2 cases even achieve complete response. Sequential therapy may be an option for these patients. The efficacy of combination treatment needs random clinical trial to be further studied.

ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of TACE combined with molecular targeted therapy (MTT) plus Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) antibodies versus MTT plus PD-(L)1 antibodies for HCC patients.MethodsData from HCC patients who received either MTT plus PD-(L)1 (systemic therapy group) or TACE combined with MTT plus PD-(L)1 (combination therapy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the objective reaction rate (ORR) at the initial assessment post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade-3 or higher adverse events.ResultsA total of 222 HCC patients were included (109 in the systemic therapy group, 113 in the combination therapy group). Propensity score matching yielded 80 patients per group. The odds ratio for ORR in the combination therapy group was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.64–2.60; p=0.479). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher ORR for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL in the combination therapy group (OR=3.54, p=0.016). For patients without PVTT, the ORR odds were slightly higher with combination therapy (OR=5.33, p=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in PFS (HR=0.68, p=0.131) or OS (HR=0.86, p=0.674) between the two groups. Higher baseline AFP (>200 ng/mL) was associated with worse PFS (HR=1.68, p=0.012) and OS (HR=2.33, p=0.021). Surgical resection improved PFS (HR=0.42, p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.31, p=0.004). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in the combination therapy group (52% vs 15%, p<0.0001).ConclusionNo significant benefits were observed for combining TACE with MTT and PD-(L)1 in unresectable HCC patients. However, TACE may offer advantages for patients with AFP≤200 ng/mL or without PVTT.

516 Background: 90Y loaded microsphere SIRT (radioembolization) is a treatment option in advanced HCC. However, no personalized dosimetric endpoints are currently used. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of 90Y loaded glass microsphere SIRT in HCC using a standard versus a personalized dosimetric approach. Methods: DOSISPHERE-01 was a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial in unresectable HCC patients with at least one tumor ≥7cm. Treatment arm was randomly assigned (1:1) to standard dosimetry arm (SDA), with a goal to deliver 120±20Gy to the treated volume or to personalized dosimetry arm (PDA) with a goal to deliver at least 205Gy to the index lesion. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) of the index lesion according to EASL criteria. Secondary endpoints included dose response evaluation, safety and overall survival (OS). Results: Sixty HCC patients were randomized (PDA 31, SDA 29, intent to treat population-ITTP-), and 56 treated (28 in each arm). RR was significantly increased in the PDA versus the SDA, in the ITTP, respectively 64.5% versus 31% (p=0.0095) as in the safety population -SP- (treatment effectively received, personalized 35, standard 21), respectively 74.3% versus 14.3% (p&lt;0.0001). Median OS was significantly increased in the PDA versus the SDA, in the ITTP, respectively 26.7m (CI 95%:11.7-NR) versus 10.6m (CI 95%:6-16.8), p=0.0096, HR=0.421 (95%CI:0.215-0.826), p=0.0119, as in the SP, respectively 26.7m (CI 95%:11.7- NR) versus 9.5m (CI 95%:4.8-14.9), p=0.0015, HR=0.342 (95%CI:0.171-0.683), p=0.0023. Median OS was 26.7m (CI 95%:13.5-NR) versus 6.0m (CI 95%:3.8-14.9) for the patients who received a tumor dose ≥205 Gy or &lt;205 Gy respectively, p=0.0106, HR=0.336 (95%CI:0.154-0.735), p=0.0063. Treatment-related clinically relevant hepatic ≥grade 3 AEs were observed in 5.7% and 14.2% of the patients of the PDA and SDA arms, respectively, (p=ns). Conclusions: MAA SPECT/CT based personalized dosimetry is safe and dramatically increased RR and OS of HCC patients. These results question the interpretation of all phase 3 trials of SIRT designed without personalized dosimetry in HCC. Clinical trial information: 2015-A00894-45.

Objective:This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with anlotinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with TACE alone.Methods:This was a single-center study, retrospectively recruited 82 unresectable HCC patients who received either TACE alone (TA group; n = 46) or TACE combined with anlotinib (TC group; n = 36) between Jan 2018 and Jan 2019. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). While the secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and main complications. Log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival difference. All statistical tests were 2-sided and P value <0.05 were taken as statistically significant.Results:Patients in TC group had a significant higher PFS than those in TA group (7.35 months vs. 5.54 months, p = 0.035). Although 3-month survival rate in the 2 groups was not statistically different (97.2% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.627), the survival rate at 6 months and 1 year were strongly higher in TC group (83.3% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.016; 66.7% vs. 19.6%, respectively, p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher ORR in TC group, while no statistical difference existed in DCR. Neither treatment-related mortality nor grade 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred. However, 2 patients in TC group had grade 3 AEs (one suffered with erythra, and the other with hand-foot-skin reaction), which disappeared after prompt treatment.Conclusion:TACE combined with anlotinib is safe and may improve outcomes for unresectable HCC patients comparing with TACE alone. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to further evaluate treatment effects of anlotinib in HCC.

4518 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with selective catheterization into the segmental or subsegmental hepatic arteries supplying HCC is often performed to achieve the complete local control of HCC in the patients with a limited number of small sized nodules. To clarify which of TACE with drug-eluting beads loaded with epirubicin (DEB-TACE) or conventional TACE with epirubicin-lipiodol (cTACE) can achieve the complete response (CR) more frequently, we performed a randomized controlled trial of DEB-TACE vs. cTACE. Methods: Between March 2016 and May 2019, unresectable HCC patients with Child-Pugh class A or B who were scheduled to receive selective TACE were randomly assigned 1:1 to the DEB-TACE group and the cTACE group. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at 3 months, and the secondary endpoints were the CR rate at 1 month and rate of adverse events (AEs). The response and AEs were assessed according to the modified RECIST by an independent review committee and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0., respectively. Results: A total of 200 patients (DEB-TACE, 99 patients; cTACE 101 patients) were enrolled from 22 Japanese institutions. The patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The median number of tumors was one in both groups and the median tumor size was 20.0 mm in the DEB-TACE group and 20.5 mm in the cTACE group. The table shows the CR rates and frequencies of AEs. The CR rates of cTACE at 3 and 1 months were significantly higher than those of DEB-TACE. The frequency of AEs (all grades), including pyrexia, malaise, increased serum total bilirubin (T-Bil) and increased serum alanine transaminase (ALT), was significantly higher in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group. Conclusions: Selective cTACE appeared to have greater efficacy for local tumor control as compared to selective DEB-TACE, however, the frequencies of post-embolization syndromes were higher in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group. Clinical trial information: UMIN000021250 . [Table: see text]

Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy is a standard of care for early stage estrogen receptor positive (ER+) patients, but analyses show the majority of benefit accrues after 10 years of treatment. Recent changes to the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations now include the option to extend tamoxifen treatment duration to 10 years. In contrast, screening trial data with 25 years of follow-up suggest that 50% of screen-detected cancers may never come to clinical attention (Miller et al BMJ 2014). Better tools are needed to identify patients who benefit from any, 5 or 10 years of adjuvant endocrine intervention. MammaPrint (MP) is an FDA-cleared gene expression signature that categorizes untreated patients as Low (LR) or High risk (HR) for distant recurrence (DR) at 10 years, independent of ER and HER2 status. Herein, we examined the performance of MP to predict long-term (25 years) survival benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy in early stage breast cancer patients randomized after surgery to receive 2 or 5 years tamoxifen vs observation only (control arm). Methods: The Stockholm Tamoxifen Trial (STO) is a uniquely annotated trial with long-term follow-up. 733 samples were made available from the 1774 lymph node negative breast cancer patients, age &amp;lt;71, with a tumor size &amp;lt;30 mm, enrolled between November 1976 and May 1990. This group was randomized to adjuvant tamoxifen versus no adjuvant therapy (surgery alone). Long-term breast cancer specific survival was determined according to MP status (LR or HR as categorized by Agendia; or UltraLow, an additional threshold proposed in 2011 as predicting exceptionally good distant disease free survival &amp;gt;10 years) for all patients as well as for each of the randomized treatment arms. MP status was successfully assessed for 656 patients; 3 patients were excluded due to missing randomization data. Multivariate proportional hazards analyses (Cox) was performed, with the multivariate model adjusted for ER, PR and HER2 status (original assessment), tumor grade and size, and treatment cohort. Results: A statistically significant difference in survival by MP risk categories was seen for all patients (P–log rank=0.0013), as well as for the tamoxifen treatment arm (P–log rank=0.011) and the control arm (P–log rank=0.047). By multivariate proportional hazards (Cox) analyses and after adjustment, women with MP–HR had a statistically significant two–fold increased risk of dying from breast cancer by 25 years (Hazards ratio, HR = 1.68, CI 1.13–2.48), compared to women with MP–LR. In this STO trial, the UltraLow threshold (MP index of &amp;gt; 0.355) was associated with a statistically significant survival advantage across all patient groups with a 95% breast cancer specific survival at 15 years. Conclusions: MP accurately predicts for a statistically significant long–term survival benefit in MP–LR patients across all STO patients and, specifically, for those who received adjuvant tamoxifen. Separation of 'UltraLow' risk patients from the MP-LR group may facilitate clinical decisions for the duration of hormonal therapy. Additional analyses are underway to evaluate the timing of risk with and without endocrine treatment stratified by MP risk categories. Citation Format: Linda S Lindstrom, Christopher C Benz, Christina Yau, Laura J van't Veer, Carlie K Thompson, Laura J Esserman. MammaPrint accurately predicts long-term survival (25 years) and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy benefit in lymph node negative patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-12.

ObjectiveThis retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a new combination therapy of the multi-level comprehensive collateral artery embolism (CAE) sequential hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for unresectable huge hepatocellular carcinoma (>10cm) patients.MethodsA propensity score-matching (PSM) cohort study was conducted. The initial tumor response, treatment-related adverse events, and survival outcomes were compared. The Forestplot package was used to visualize and interpret forest plots of overall survival subgroup analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors of overall survival.ResultsThirty-one pairs of patients were evaluated after PSM. There were statistically significant differences in the initial tumor response and objective response rate (ORR) between the two groups (74.2% vs 48.4%, P=0.037). Compared with the “HAIC” group, the incidence of abdominal pain was higher in the “CAE+HAIC” group (71.0% vs 41.9%, P=0.021). The OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the “CAE+HAIC” group were longer than those of the “HAIC” group (OS: HR=0.439, 95% CI: 0.199–0.970, P=0.042; PFS: HR=0.475; 95% CI: 0.252–0.895; P=0.021). The CAE (HR=0.403, 95% CI: 0.213–0.762; P=0.005), prealbumin levels <170 mg/L (HR=2.195, 95% CI: 1.226–3.929; P=0.008), and lactic dehydrogenase levels >245 U/L (HR=2.136, 95% CI: 1.215–3.757; P=0.008) were independent risk factors of OS.ConclusionsThe multi-level comprehensive CAE sequential HAIC, combined with TKI and ICI, can improve tumor response and prolong survival time in unresectable huge HCC patients while remaining safe and tolerable.

BackgroundsTo compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab (TLC) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with those of TACE alone .MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 222 patients with uHCC who were treated between September 2013 and Jun 2023. One group received TACE + lenvatinib + camrelizumab (TLC) (n = 97) and another group received TACE alone (n = 151). Efficacy and safety were compared after propensity score matching between the TLC and TACE groups.ResultsAfter propensity matching, the TLC group had higher objective response rate (ORR) (88.6% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001), disease control rate (DCR) (94.3%% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.001), and conversion rates before and after propensity matching were 44.1% and 41.4%, respectively, compared with the TACE group. The median progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (12.7 vs. 6.1 months, P = 0.005). The median overall survival (OS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (19.4 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.023). Cox multivariate analysis with different modes of adjustment showed that treatment was an independent influencing factor of PFS and OS. The interaction analysis showed that cirrhosis and Child-Pugh stage an interactive role in the PFS of different treatment. Decreased AFP after treatment portends higher ORR and DCR.ConclusionTACE combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab regimen was safe and superior to TACE alone in improving PFS, OS, and tumor response rates for unresectable recurrent HCC patients.

SIB-IMRT combined with apatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with poor response to transarterial chemoembolization

PurposeThis study was developed to compare the efficacy of combined D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment to that of TACE + sorafenib treatment for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.Patients and MethodsHere, a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) from March 2018 to March 2022 at the our hospital was conducted. In total, 60 patients underwent treatment with drug-eluting beads-TACE-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (Group A), while 21 underwent combined TACE and sorafenib treatment (Group B).ResultsIn this study cohort, the rate of surgical conversion in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (33.3% vs 9.5%). As per the Revised Evaluation Criteria for Clinical Efficacy in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria, the objective remission rate in Group A was significantly higher than that in Group B (86.6% vs 33.4%). Group A also exhibited significantly higher rates of overall adverse events including hypertension, abdominal pain, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoproteinemia as compared to Group B, although the incidence of hand-foot syndrome in Group A was significantly reduced as compared to Group B (13.3% vs 42.8%). The median progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) of patients in Group A were 13.2 and 28.8 months, with both being significantly higher than the corresponding intervals in Group B (5.7 and 10.8 months, respectively). Cox multivariate analyses identified combination D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib+ PD-1 inhibitor treatment as being independently associated with patient PFS and OS.ConclusionIn summary, D-TACE-HAIC + lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor treatment exhibits a favorable safety profile, outperforming TACE + sorafenib treatment for unresectable HCC patients while improving overall rates of translational efficacy, increasing rates of surgical conversion, prolonging patient survival, and conferring long-term survival benefits.

Elucidating the Role of Chest Wall Irradiation in ‘Intermediate-risk’ Breast Cancer: the MRC/EORTC SUPREMO Trial