Abstract

When boundary evidence of record is vague or uncertain, the intent of the parties to a grant may be inferred from physical evidence which witnesses this intent. In the retracement of boundaries abutting a railroad physical evidence is of two types: (1) Evidence of the location of the roadbed proper; and (2) evidence of the limits of the right‐of‐way as witnessed by fences, ditches, and other objects which would tend to indicate the extent of ownership. Direct evidence of roadbed location can be obtained by mathematically locating the center of the existing tracks and taking into account the necessary geometry of railroad curves and spirals as presented herein. While this allows the surveyor to mathematically define the location of the track, there is no assurance that the roadbed is located at the center of the right‐of‐way. Evidence of the boundary in the form of fences, ditches, or similar markings can serve to collaborate or contradict right‐of‐way location as inferred from the roadbed. In reconciling ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.