Abstract
The term “in the wild” has become wildly popular in face recognition research. The term refers generally to use of datasets that are somehow less controlled or more realistic. In this work, we consider how face recognition accuracy varies according to the composition of the dataset on which the decision threshold is learned and the dataset on which performance is then measured. We identify different acquisition locations in the FRVT 2006 dataset, examine face recognition accuracy for within-environment image matching and cross-environment image matching, and suggest a way to improve biometric systems that encounter images taken in multiple locations. We find that false non-matches are more likely to occur when the gallery and probe images are acquired in different locations, and that false matches are more likely when the gallery and probe images were acquired in the same location. These results show that measurements of face recognition accuracy are dependent on environment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.