Abstract
It has been proposed that patterns in the usage of synonymous codons provide evidence that individual tRNA molecules are recycled through the ribosome, translating several occurrences of the same amino acid before diffusing away. The claimed evidence is based on counting the frequency with which pairs of synonymous codons are used at nearby occurrences of the same amino acid, as compared to the frequency expected if each codon were chosen independently from a single genome-wide distribution. We show that such statistics simply measure variation in codon preferences across a genome. As a negative control on the potential contribution of pressure to exploit tRNA recycling on these signals, we examine correlations in the usage of codons that encode different amino acids. We find that these controls are statistically as strong as the claimed evidence and conclude that there is no informatic evidence that tRNA recycling is a force shaping codon usage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
