Abstract

Land-use change in tropical forests can reduce biodiversity and ecosystem carbon (C) storage, but although changes in aboveground biomass C in human-modified tropical forests are well documented, patterns in the dynamics and storage of C belowground are less well characterised. To address this, we used a reciprocal litter transplant experiment to assess litter decomposition and soil respiration under distinct litter types in forested or converted habitats in Panama, Central America, and in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. The converted habitats comprised a large clearing on the Panama Canal and oil palm plantation in Borneo; forested habitats comprised a 60-year old secondary forest in Panama and a disturbed forest in Borneo that was selectively logged until 2008. In each habitat, we installed mesocosms and litterbags with litter collected from old-growth forest, secondary forest or an introduced species: Elaeis guineensis in Borneo and Saccharum spontaneum in Panama. We measured litter mass loss, soil respiration, and soil microbial biomass during nine months at each site. Decomposition differed markedly between habitat types and between forest vs. introduced litter, but the decay rates and properties of old-growth and secondary forest litters in the forest habitats were remarkably similar, even across continents. Slower decomposition of all litter types in the converted habitats was largely explained by microclimate, but the faster decay of introduced litter was linked to lower lignin content compared to the forest litter. Despite marked differences in litter properties and decomposition, there was no effect of litter type on soil respiration or microbial biomass. However, regardless of location, litter type, and differences in soil characteristics, we measured a similar decline in microbial activity and biomass in the absence of litter inputs. Interestingly, whereas microbial biomass and soil respiration increased substantially in response to litter inputs in the forested habitats and the converted habitat in Panama, there was little or no corresponding increase in the converted habitat in Borneo, indicating that soil recovery capacity had declined substantially in oil palm plantations. Overall, our results suggest that litter inputs are essential to preserve key soil processes, but litter diversity may be less important, especially in highly disturbed habitats.

Highlights

  • Intact tropical forests are one of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) sinks; they sequester an estimated 1.1 ± 0.3 Pg C y−1 (Malhi, 2010) and tropical forests contain c. 55% of the terrestrial organic C stock (Pan et al, 2011), making them an essential part of the global C balance

  • Where we found no effects of individual litter treatments, we conducted a second set of analyses assessing the general influence of litter inputs on soil respiration and microbial biomass in the different habitats by comparing the mean values across all litter treatments to the bare soil controls

  • We found little evidence to support this hypothesis as microbial biomass in the converted habitat only responded to litter inputs at Barro Colorado Nature Monument (BCNM), and the response of soil respiration was lower in converted habitats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intact tropical forests are one of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) sinks; they sequester an estimated 1.1 ± 0.3 Pg C y−1 (Malhi, 2010) and tropical forests contain c. 55% of the terrestrial organic C stock (Pan et al, 2011), making them an essential part of the global C balance. Intact tropical forests are one of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) sinks; they sequester an estimated 1.1 ± 0.3 Pg C y−1 (Malhi, 2010) and tropical forests contain c. Tropical deforestation is responsible for the release of 1.7 Pg C per year and logging and land cover change are responsible for 25% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (Le Quéré et al, 2018); in 2014, deforestation and forest degradation were responsible for tree cover loss amounting to 24 million hectares (Global Forest Watch, 2018). Forest degradation and conversion affect carbon storage belowground: direct conversion from primary forest to agricultural land results in losses of 20–30% of soil organic carbon (SOC) and secondary forests store an estimated 9% less C in soils than primary forests (Don et al, 2011), which is cause for concern as tropical forests contain c. For example in Central and South America, conversion to pastures plays a key role (Armenteras et al, 2017), whereas in Southeast Asia, most of the degradation happens because of conversion of forest to croplands (Reynolds et al, 2011; Wilcove et al, 2013), in particular oil palm plantations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.