Abstract

A major problem faced by government as trustee of society charged with conserving the nation's forest environmental asset is that the standard Economic Account for Forestry (EAF) fails to measure the contribution of nature to total forest incomes and environmental assets. In the context of this government mission, the debate arises with regard to how to uncover the contribution of nature to the total forest incomes enjoyed by people through a refined accounting framework which extends the EAF. The latter is applied by the statistics office to estimate the values added of timber, firewood, cork, resin, industrial nut and other non-woody final products of the forest at national/sub-national scale. Bearing in mind this narrow scope of the EAF, this research proposes the application of the experimental Agroforestry Accounting System (AAS), which extends the forest incomes and environmental asset estimates by applying simulated exchange values stated/revealed by consumers for non-market public goods and services. We apply the EAF and AAS frameworks to 12 large publicly-owned protected conifer forest farms which are not available for sale on the competitive land market and which cover an area of 47,262 ha in Andalusia-Spain. In this conifer farm case study, the EAF considers the economic activities of timber, firewood, aromatic plants and residential service. The AAS adds to the EAF activities those of grazing, conservation forestry, hunting, livestock, agricultural crops, livestock-keeper private amenity, fire services, free access recreation, mushrooms, carbon, landscape conservation, threatened wild biodiversity and water supply runoff stored lower down the watershed in public reservoirs. The objectives of this conifer farm case study are, first, to compare the final products and incomes estimated by applying the EAF and AAS frameworks and, second, to measure the sensitivity of conifer farm environmental assets to changes in land ownership rights and discounting rates in accordance with the AAS results. The conifer farm results show total income measured by the AAS is 38 times higher than the EAF net value added (NVA) for the 2010 period. The AAS economic activities of forestry conservation, fire services and landscape conservation activities generate 71% of the conifer farm labour compensation. The AAS opening environmental asset measured at the assumed competitive real baseline discounting rate of 3% is 6371.6 €/ha, which is 3.7 times lower than it would be if the conifer farm was available for sale on the competitive land market. The change in the baseline discounting rate chosen, from 3% to 1.5%, would lead to an increase of 116% in the value of the opening environmental asset. The above results reveal the inconsistent EAF measurement of total conifer farm incomes. The sensitivity analysis underlines the important effects on the environmental asset arising from changes in land ownership rights and discounting rates.

Highlights

  • More than 70 years after its implementation, we note that the stan­ dard Economic Account for Forestry (EAF) still hides or omits the contribution of nature to the net value added (NVA) of products with and without market prices, respectively, from forest-based natural eco­ nomic activities managed by farmer and government

  • This study demonstrates that by applying the Agroforestry Ac­ counting System (AAS) criteria it is possible to integrate environmental assets with the manufactured capital and to measure environmental assets of products without market prices in a manner consistent with the System of National Accounts (SNA) valuation criterion of the exchange value of products with market prices

  • In the conifer farm case study, the application of the official Eco­ nomic Account for Forestry gives a net value added of 6.9 €/ha versus the total income measured by the Agroforestry Accounting System (AAS) of 267.5 €/ha

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than 70 years after its implementation, we note that the stan­ dard Economic Account for Forestry (EAF) still hides or omits the contribution of nature to the net value added (NVA) of products with and without market prices, respectively, from forest-based natural eco­ nomic activities managed by farmer and government. This research addresses the challenge of standardising forest economic-environmental accounts by extending the standard EAF This extension is based on the valuation of final products consumed ac­ cording to their transaction prices observed in formal markets or simulated markets for products without market prices. We apply the EAF to four and the AAS to 17 individual economic activities valued in the conifer farms (see details in Supplementary texts S2–S3). Farmer and government management regimes on these conifer farms are aimed at conserving the multiple traditional and emergent economic uses This is done by planning the complete rotations or cycles of har­ vesting and natural growth of multi-period animal and plant products The main innovation of this AAS application to conifer farms is the comparison of environmental asset values under the assumption of changes in land ownership buying/selling rights.

Brief review of the literature on forest economic accounting
Accounting frameworks and transaction prices
Total capital of the conifer farm under the AAS
Others
Net value added of the conifer farm under the AAS
Ecosystem services of the conifer farm under the AAS
Total income of the conifer farm under the AAS
Conifer farm product and income results comparison under AAS and EAF
Intermediate
Accounting frameworks and policy discussions
Standard forest account failure to value hidden non-market products
Strengths and weaknesses of the AAS conifer farm application
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.