Abstract

The expansion of the recycling market basically depends on making the use of recycled aggregates viable. In that direction strategies and scientific methodologies are welcome to meet the Agenda 21. However, it is difficult to find appropriate measurement methods. For this reason, creating databases that associate the life cycle of materials and processes with consumption and discard of the materials could be a starting point in supporting environmentally up-to-date choices. Carbon dioxide stands out among the impacts of construction materials. Carbon footprint is a subset of the Life Cycle Assessment study, and in the present political context, in general in countries in the Northern Hemisphere it is one of the most-used factors in the decision process regarding sustainable consumption and production. The objective of this article was to develop an inventory of bricks made with construction and demolition waste in Belo Horizonte in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, and Compared to the other blocks: concrete, ceramic. The material components of the life cycles of the agents involved in this study were input into Umberto software, defining the unit for each type of material separated into groups (work folders in Umberto). These work folders were created for energy, emissions, raw materials, supply and other items. Then this study’s flow networks are presented. Three different scenarios were created: the ceramic brick manufacturing scenario; the concrete block manufacturing scenario; and the CDW block manufacturing scenario. This inventory is fundamental for the directives of Life Cycle Assessment. Using this starting point, a comparison is made between the production process inventory of concrete blocks and ceramic bricks. This comparison was related to CO2 emission parameters. The following methods were used for this: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with reverse logic to obtain data from the point of consumption to the point of origin. Supplies for manufacturing ceramic block, concrete block, and extraction of non-renewable resources are taken from literature. Flow networks were developed for both processes on Umberto software and were compared. The objectives, scope, functional unit, systems, limits and results of this LCA are presented graphically and with a Sankey diagram with discussion. The main contribution of the article refers to sustainable use when considering choice of construction material with less environmental costs through the lens of “carbon footprint”. This is a first approximation.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.19.2.17346

Highlights

  • 2017/2/19 struction waste makes up about 40% of the waste picked up by public services every day in Belo Horizonte (SINDUSCON-MG, 2008)

  • In Brazil, these solid wastes represent around 50% of all urban solid waste

  • The strategy used in the case study in Belo Horizonte, in particular Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), approaches the strategy adopted by Lithuania, as waste treatment is covered by this block (EC, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

2017/2/19 struction waste makes up about 40% of the waste picked up by public services every day in Belo Horizonte (SINDUSCON-MG, 2008). The indicators adopted in this academic work are focused only on the quantitative analysis of carbon dioxide emissions, though Sustainable development indicators have been grouped based on the three main sustainable development sectors: environmental status, economic development and social development. With the rapid growth of the city of Belo Horizonte, as was observed in Lithuania (Staniskis & Plepiene, 2006), introduces the need to share the principle of science, knowledge and technological progress. According to this principle, the development of different sectors and their branches must be based on modern scientific achievements, knowledge and the latest environment-friendly technologies. In the face of growing energy consumption and scarce consumption of renewable energy sources, nuclear energy prevented any marked increase in greenhouse gases throughout the independence period

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.