Lessons From an Irish University Co-Learning Pilot: Creating Mutual Learning in Shared Educational Spaces

This study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate the teacher-based usability of a culturally responsive, web-based animated teaching package (WATP) aligned with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). Guided by a design-based research (DBR) approach, the study employed an instructional framework grounded in direct instruction to address the learning characteristics of individuals with ID. Formative evaluation was conducted across three iterative design cycles with 10 special education teachers and 5 instructional technologists, whose feedback informed continuous refinement of the WATP. Summative evaluation focused on usability testing and was conducted with 30 special education teachers who were not involved in the design process. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The WATP achieved a mean SUS score of 78.17, corresponding to a Good-Excellent level of usability. Internal consistency was acceptable to high (Cronbach’s alpha = .823 for positively worded items; .708 for negatively worded items). The findings demonstrate that integrating culturally responsive content, direct instruction, and UDL principles within an iterative DBR framework can result in highly usable and accessible instructional materials for learners with ID.

The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles suggest that providing learners multiple means for engagement, representation, and action and expression will help learners become purposeful and motivated, resourceful and knowledgeable, and strategic and goal-directed (CAST, 2018). The purpose of this study was to explore the challenges and opportunities of adopting UDL principles for online course design using the decision-making process as the theoretical framework as defined by the Diffusion of Innovation theory (Rogers, 2003). Seven online faculty were interviewed regarding the challenges and opportunities that hindered or helped their decision to adopt the UDL principles in online course design. Additionally, three faculty participants volunteered course materials as examples of how they applied UDL principles. Results highlight ways institutions of higher education can promote faculty adoption of UDL principles for online course design.

The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles suggest that providing learners multiple means for engagement, representation, and action and expression will help learners become purposeful and motivated, resourceful and knowledgeable, and strategic and goal-directed (CAST, 2018). The purpose of this study was to explore the challenges and opportunities of adopting UDL principles for online course design using the decision-making process as the theoretical framework as defined by the Diffusion of Innovation theory (Rogers, 2003). Seven online faculty were interviewed regarding the challenges and opportunities that hindered or helped their decision to adopt the UDL principles in online course design. Additionally, three faculty participants volunteered course materials as examples of how they applied UDL principles. Results highlight ways institutions of higher education can promote faculty adoption of UDL principles for online course design.

Educator teams consisting of a general education teacher and a special education teacher were recruited to participate in a project where they used the Systematic Supports Planning Process to plan, implement, and monitor individualized supports for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) attending general education classrooms. Educators completed a survey before and after the project where they assessed their confidence in applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and provided examples of how they applied UDL principles in their classrooms. Although quantitative responses indicated the confidence levels of general education teachers and special education teachers increased following participation in the project, qualitative findings were mixed regarding specific actions that demonstrated how UDL principles were applied. The implications for future research and professional development on UDL and arranging individualized supports in general education classrooms for students with IDD are discussed.

As higher education professionals work to reduce barriers in curriculum and instruction and cultivate inclusive online educational environments, it is crucial to address the unique challenges faced by gender-expansive students, a population that has received minimal attention in research and practice. This chapter focuses on applying universal design for learning (UDL) principles to address the challenges faced by gender-expansive students in higher education settings, particularly in online learning environments. Gender-expansive students often encounter unique social and academic hurdles that significantly impact their educational outcomes and well-being compared to their cisgender peers. This chapter delves into the alignment between UDL principles and the needs of gender-expansive students, highlighting strategies to identify and mitigate barriers to meaningful access in curriculum and instruction.

This study examines the implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles in teacher preparation courses, emphasizing the role of teacher educators in modeling best practices. The research focuses on two aspects: (1) Does modeling UDL principles that align with student needs enhance engagement in teacher preparation courses? and (2) How do students perceive the impact of UDL principles on their individual learning needs and their ability to express and engage in courses? Utilizing a mixed-methods action research design, this study fosters reflective practice among teacher educators and evaluates the effectiveness of UDL strategies. Findings indicate that the instructors were highly effective in creating a positive and inclusive learning environment, enabling students to feel supported and safe in expressing themselves. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on effective teaching strategies in higher education, highlighting the importance of UDL in preparing future educators.

Providing an inclusive education to students with intellectual disability in higher education is an emerging challenge. This paper presents the results of a research study that analyses the perceptions of graduates from the Promentor Programme (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain). The study follows a phenomenological design and employs qualitative research methodology. Two focus groups are conducted, with 14 participants in total. The participants’ perspective is structured around the following categories: (a) Quality of life and training received; (b) barriers encountered; (c) supports received; and (d) lecturers’ competences. In general, participants give their experience a positive assessment in relation to aspects such as social inclusion, professional and personal development or self-esteem. The study’s conclusions highlight the convenience of an inclusive and qualitative research design that will serve to hear the voices of persons with intellectual disability, as well as their perception of the positive impact of university education on their lives. Points of interest This article focuses on the perspective of Spanish university students with intellectual disability in order to understand their perceptions of their training experience in an inclusive higher education course. An inclusive research design is adopted which seeks to give voice to people with intellectual disability not only as participants, but also as members of the research team. The study confirms that, from the students’ perspective, university environments can be suitable for the education of students with intellectual disability; therefore, the creation of inclusive higher education programmes should be encouraged. University lecturers should receive training in inclusive education. Higher education institutions must take into account the voices of vulnerable groups of students in order to effectively eliminate existing barriers.

Gamification is an increasingly popular strategy to foster engagement in education. This paper reflects on digital escape rooms in the learning environment and their alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles. Four digital escape rooms based on different anatomy and physiology themes were developed as revision exercises for a first-year biomedical engineering class. Students self-organized into small groups and completed the activities. Results from feedback surveys revealed positive student experiences, with 91% finding the activity engaging and 86% indicating its positive impact on learning. 82% of students said that the digital escape room helped create a sense of community in the class. Students commented on the development of collaborative skills, quick thinking, and coping mechanisms under pressure. Discussion centres on the alignment of digital escape rooms with UDL principles, addressing multiple means of engagement, representation, and action & expression.

Learning environments are increasingly expected to enable students to develop competencies necessary for addressing complex social, environmental, and technological challenges in sustainable societies. Within this context, instructional approaches that are inclusive, flexible, and learner-centered have gained increasing importance. This study investigates the effects of project-based learning (PBL) informed by Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles on secondary school students’ 21st-century skills. Employing a mixed-methods embedded design, the quantitative component utilized a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group model. The study was conducted with 60 eleventh-grade students enrolled in a public high school, with one group receiving UDL-informed PBL instruction and the other following the standard curriculum. Data were collected using the 21st Century Learner Skills Usage Scale and analyzed through paired-samples t-tests, independent-samples t-tests, and ANCOVA. The findings revealed statistically significant improvements in the experimental group’s overall 21st-century skills, particularly in cognitive skills and collaboration and flexibility, with medium to large effect sizes. In contrast, the control group showed no meaningful gains, and a decline was observed in innovation skills. The results indicate that project-based learning informed by UDL principles constitutes an effective pedagogical approach for fostering inclusive and sustainable learning environments that support the development of future-oriented learner competencies. These findings further suggest that integrating UDL principles into project-based instructional models may contribute to competency-oriented and inclusive secondary education systems aligned with sustainability frameworks.

Management of Inclusive Education: Insights from SD Plus Darul Ulum Elementary School in Indonesia. Objectives : This study investigates SD Plus Darul Ulum, an Indonesian elementary school, examining its management of inclusive education, interactions, and socialization for special needs children. Methods: Using qualitative methods, data was collected through observations and interviews with key stakeholders, including teachers, administrators, parents, and students, then thematically analyzed. Findings: Findings reveal SD Plus Darul Ulum's strengths in engagement, student-centered learning, collaboration, diversity appreciation, and supportive physical environment. Teachers adapt methods, utilize diverse resources, and employ flexible assessments, while collaboration involves professionals, parents, and support staff to tailor strategies. The school prioritizes a physically accessible environment, employing Universal Design for Learning principles and assistive technologies. Conclusion: In conclusion, SD Plus Darul Ulum's commitment to inclusive education is deeply rooted in theories such as Universal Design for Learning, Differentiated Instruction, Social Constructivism, and Inclusive Education Principles. Keywords: inclusive education, special needs, elementary school, management strategies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i1.202416

As English-medium instruction ( EMI ) continues to expand globally, meeting the needs of diverse student cohorts in multilingual and multicultural settings remains a major challenge. This study investigates the inclusivity of EMI at the Faculty of Architecture (FoA) at one of Poland’s leading public universities. Drawing on interview data from 11 architecture students, we conducted Reflexive Thematic Analysis to explore their experiences and perceptions of lecturers’ instructional practices, with particular attention to their alignment with Universal Design for Learning ( UDL ) principles—an intersection previously unexplored in EMI research. Three themes were identified: disciplinary knowledge development, language practices, and the social-affective environment. This article focuses on the first two. Findings reveal that UDL principles are only partially reflected in the EMI programme. Students are rarely offered meaningful choice in content, topics, or tools for assignments and assessment. Instruction remains largely teacher-centred, with limited use of varied presentation modes to accommodate diverse learning preferences. Major concerns also include poor accessibility of teaching materials and insufficient English proficiency of some lecturers, which hinders content comprehension. In addition, the frequent use of Polish—by both staff and local students—leaves international students feeling excluded. These findings underscore the urgent need to adapt instructional and language practices in EMI to better support student diversity and foster more inclusive, universally designed learning environments, in turn enhancing the overall quality of EMI .

The goal of this communication is to provide clinicians and behavioral scientists with a scoping perspective on the diverse array of impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the U.S. It is our hope that this will stimulate subsequent scientific and advocacy efforts to ameliorate the disproportionate burden of the pandemic on people with IDD.We begin with the assertion that among non-infected persons in the U.S. few are more adversely affected by COVID-19 than individuals with IDD, given that a vast proportion require in-person care or critical therapeutic support within their living environments, with little back-up or systematic coverage for prolonged interruption of services.Many have temporarily lost access to trained caregivers or community service providers, and now face evolving threats to the return of baseline service, given uncertainties in State and agency budgets.Therefore, a first priority relates to restoration of in-person support services or comparable alternatives.There have been emerging guidelines on the safe care and support of individuals with IDD during the COVID pandemic-see Supplementary Table (ST) 1 which lists resources and documentation of early success of such strategies, however guidance is still evolving, has not permeated all reaches of the community where the information is desperately needed, and is not always presented in ways that can be fully comprehended by those with IDD.It must be

This presentation showcases findings from a Canadian study which was carried out through 2023-24. This project explores an innovative facet of the momentum around sustainability within higher education, one that goes beyond the focus on environmental and operational preoccupations and concentrates on social and pedagogical sustainability. It examines the way the introduction of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a campus, through the creation of a cross-discipline community of practice, can (i) empower faculty to develop sustainable accessible practices within their own classroom, (ii) significantly reduce the reliance of the campus on accessibility services and reduce the pressure felt by these services, (iii) successfully integrate accessibility and inclusion within institutional strategic thinking around sustainability. The presentation synthesizes findings from a qualitative action-research project which examined perceptions and experiences of 14 stakeholders with different status and toles across the campus. The study adopted a phenomenological approach to data collection and analysis (Holland, 2014) and explored the participants’ own constructs in relation to the overlap between UDL and sustainability. Accessibility in the higher education has thus far been addressed through a medical model approach focused on retrofitting. In a nutshell, teaching and learning is designed for the ‘traditional learner’ and support services take on the task of supporting students who experience barriers in this design, with remedial, targeted services outside the classroom. The demographics of higher education, however, have changed widely over the last two decades, and retrofitting approaches are no longer sustainable. The volume of demand is growing exponentially, wait times increase, and the cost of Accessibility Services increases in a way that becomes unmanageable within most post-secondary campuses (NEADS, 2018). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) can address many of these strains on resources. Indeed, UDL is an emerging model for the management of diversity in the classroom which equips instructors to remove the majority of barriers to access to learning and support the needs of most diverse learners within the classroom itself (Al-Azawei et al., 2016). The literature highlights that most of the needs of diverse learners can be addressed with ease within the classroom itself once inclusive design and UDL are adopted and integrated as a mindset, across institutions (Baumann & Melle, 2019; Dalton et al., 2019). UDL can therefore address some of the concerns over the sustainability of current disability service provision models. The need for a sustainable lens in this area is therefore tangible and pressing. Accessibility services, student services personnel, and faculty are all painfully feeling first-hand the inability of the current structure to meet the needs of diverse learners and to address the volume of service requests. UDL has the potential to address this strain on support services and to re-empower faculty to create inclusive provisions within the classroom space. A practical example of this would be the considerable pressure placed on accessibility services to digitalize printed material or to seek alternate versions of PDFs that are shared in class but are not accessible with reading software. This is an example of costly, repetitive use of resources that can be solved sustainably by empowering instructors to use the UDL principles in their class design and not rely on print only or on non-accessible digital documents. This has immediate resource and funding implications. UDL integration represents a clear example of sustainable transformation: an initial focus on professional development with faculty leads to a reduction in spending and resources that are non-renewable (Fovet, 2017). The presentation showcases the wider implications for UDL development across the sector.

The inclusion of individuals with disabilities in concept and practice is not new to education. However, the attainment of inclusion has been a struggle in most Western countries since the 1980s. The application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to classroom practices has the promise of making the goal of inclusion more attainable. In this chapter, the authors outline a definition of inclusion as a foundation for the need for Universal Design. Then a description of the important principles of UDL is described, with attention to the research that supports its use and application. Lastly, the authors describe the technology trends that, along with UDL principles, have the greatest impact on education in K-12 classrooms, higher education, virtual settings, and in community settings with adults and seniors.

Introduction This study examines the ways in which students and staff in higher education use and engage in audio, both in everyday life and within the university setting. Specifically, we explore if the increasingly diverse student population utilise audio as part of a personalised approach to learning. Increasing student engagement in online delivery through a personalised approach to learning is a vital area of focus in contemporary pedagogy internationally. The rapid move to online delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed both opportunities and challenges for learners with diverse digital access requirements (Ellis et al. 17). Along with captions – which have been embraced as an accessibility feature by the entire student population (Ellis et al.) – the use of audio has increased (Peaty et al. 7). Digital accessibility has typically focussed on the availability of captions, yet the experience of many students during COVID-19 pandemic-imposed remote learning activities shows that audio also offers great potential for personalisation, accessibility, and engagement. With audio options following the trajectory of captions in both education and entertainment contexts to become recognised as a personal preference (Ellis 167), this article examines whether higher education has responded to the ‘audio turn’. Moreover, it seeks to answer how students, as a diverse population, utilise audio as part of their learning experience. The ‘audio turn’ refers to the recent period marked by the COVID-19 pandemic, alongside the increase in (and use of) audio platforms and features. However, it should also be acknowledged that this audio turn is also part of a longer history of technology-enabled audio pedagogy, encompassing transitions from vinyl to cassette tape, and analogue to digital. These specific changes over approximately the last five years have been captured in the literature on the rise of audio description (see for example Peaty et al.; Piñeiro-Otero and Pedrero-Esteban), audiobooks and “listening culture” (Snelling 648), studies on the uptake of podcasts and digital radio (St. Aubin), and popular articles (Forbes). In a relatively short period of time, audio book sales, podcasting, digital music consumption, and audio accessibility (including audio description) have increased significantly. The culmination of new business models (e.g., Spotify’s audio-first strategy; Kilberg and Spilker 156) and the specific remote learning/working, lockdown environments generated by COVID-19 mitigation policies further facilitated this audio turn. The rise of the value and use of audio also extended into the university context, which prompted new literature on audio learning strategies (Wake et al. 30; Jensen and Veprinska). However, the question arises: despite the increased interest in audio, has higher education pedagogy adapted to reflect learning options and preferences? Audio in Higher Education Over the past decade, a body of research has emerged that highlights opportunities for audio in the higher education context; however, there remains a lack of research on the potential of audio more broadly for learning personalisation and accessibility. Most of the existing research on audio supported pedagogy has centred around the value of audio feedback on assessments (Knauf 442; Sarcona et al. 47; Heimbürger 106). With over a decade of publications on this type of audio-supported learning, researchers have found audio feedback to be divisive, in part due to the varied nature in which it is applied and received (Hennesy and Forrester 778), but Sacona et al. (58) emphasise students’ desire for the availability of both modalities of feedback (audio and written). Other audio learning alternatives discussed in the literature on audio-supported pedagogy include podcasts (McGarr; Gunderson and Cumming 591; Gachago et al. 859) and, to a lesser degree, the role of audio description (Pintado et al.), which may in part be the result of the recency of use of audio description in the media more broadly. One of the key features of more recent (post-2020) research into various audio alternatives or audio-supported learning options was the consistent observation that audio is an important part of universal design for learning (UDL) and its value and appeal for an increasingly diverse student population. UDL is an important concept in understanding the role of audio in higher education, as it is not simply focussed on ‘access to the classroom’, but the ways in which access to educational content, texts, and teaching is considered. It is centred on three principles: multiple means of representation, multiple means of engagement, and multiple means of expression (Cumming and Rose 1026). Pertinent to our research, UDL emphasises multiple formats for learning materials, including audio. Moreover, developed in the early 2000s, UDL recognises the role of digital technology in addressing the needs of an increasingly diverse student population (Edyburn 16). It is adapted from Universal Design (UD), which is based on a set of principles: equitable use, flexibility in use, simple and intuitive use, perceptible information, tolerance for error, low physical effort, and size and space for approach and use (Centre for Universal Design). While acknowledging the broader research literature and debates around cognitive styles, learning strategies, learning styles, and their efficacy in instruction (Cassidy 420), this project uses the term ‘learning preferences’ to capture the preferred, individual approaches to a task or learning situation. Auditory preferences are common amongst most models of learning styles; however, the scope of this study did not extend to other learning preferences or alternatives. Instead, this pilot research project, informed by the ‘audio turn’ and increased interest in UDL, sought to better understand how students and staff in the university context perceive, utilise, and engage with audio, both in everyday life and in higher education. Methodology The rationale for this project is based on UDL theories of flipped learning (Wolf et al.) and the use of captions in teaching and learning (Ellis et al.). UDL seeks to remove barriers and emphasises the importance of creating learning environments that offer multiple ways of engaging with content, and of accessing and representing information (Behling and Tobin 2). Wolf et al.’s research on flipped learning (replacing traditional lectures with online recordings) discovered that students who self-diagnosed attention deficit issues preferred the online option as it allowed them to break learning into small chunks. The opportunity to personalise study experiences to meet individual learning preferences was valued by the entire cohort, including students who preferred on-campus and face-to-face learning. These findings informed the development of a multimodal methodology in which participant responses are gathered from both researchers’ questions and from interaction and engagement with alternative learning formats. Firstly, a survey on the use of audio in everyday life and learning environments was created via Qualtrics and disseminated to students and staff. This was achieved in conjunction with the Digital Student Engagement Team, who promoted the survey via internal channels, Digital Screens, and Instagram stories. Several of the Faculties and Schools taking part in the research also distributed links to the survey via internal emails and the university’s learning platform. The survey was open for a ten-week period in the second half of 2023. Secondly, this project trialled embedding audio in teaching resources within four different units across two Faculties (Humanities and Business and Law), and then obtained feedback from students on their interactions with these new learning formats. Specifically, we added audio description to key resources in each unit, provided the option for audio feedback on at least one assignment per unit, and offered an audio version of the assessment guide. Students in the participating units were then invited to partake in an end-of-study-period focus group that discussed their uptake of and experience with the additional audio resources. The semi-structured discussions were facilitated in-person for on-campus units, and online via WebEx for offshore and online cohorts. The qualitative results from the focus groups and survey underwent thematic analysis. Research Findings Across both the survey findings and focus group discussions it emerged that audio played a pivotal role in students’ everyday life, and that this role had both increased in the past four years and manifested into a desire to utilise more audio alternatives in their learning experiences. There was a clear awareness of individuals’ personal learning preferences and what format they best responded to, as well as recognition that peers may have other preferences. These different types of learning preferences were reflected in the varied responses to extra audio-based learning material; while some students appreciated audio feedback on assessments, others preferred written feedback, in particular for ease of referencing and in order to refer back to it at a later point in time. Through the learner lens, audio does not appear to have replaced written learning material; instead, it is seen as complementary – and vice versa. Demographics Of the 268 survey participants (supplemented by an additional 31 focus group participants), 16.5% were staff. The responses primarily came from first-year students (26%), with relatively similar percentages of second-, third-year, and postgraduate students. In keeping with these enrolment demographics, most respondents were between the ages of 18 and 24 (43%). Students and staff in the Faculty of Humanities were significantly represented (57%), and most participants studied or taught online for some or all of the time (33% stated that they studied or