Lenin and Revolutionary Democracy
Lenin is the obvious keystone of what can be called ‘the Bolshevik tradition’. There has been considerable confusion over the meaning of this term, with frequent identification of it with the murderously bureaucratic phenomenon that in fact strangled it (for example, J. Arch Getty's description of Stalin's 1930s purges as ‘the self-destruction of the Bolsheviks’). To the contrary – Lenin and the Bolshevik tradition he represents are inseparable from the revolutionary, anti-dogmatic, profoundly democratic perspectives of Karl Marx. While rooted in problems and contradictions arising within ‘Leninism’ and Bolshevism in the difficult years of 1918–1924, Stalinism represents a qualitative divergence. In fact, Bolshevism is a tradition that is essential to the best and most activist elements associated with ‘Western Marxism’ – particularly as represented by its foundational figures of the 1920s, Lukács and Gramsci – and with currents influenced by Trotsky. It is likely that a resurgence of left-wing activism will cause renewed scholarly debate on the issue of Lenin and revolutionary democracy.