Legality and Reality: Some Lessons from the Pitcairn Islands

Abstract

This article considers the decision to prosecute a number of Pitcairn islanders for offences under the UK Sexual Offences Act 1956, and some aspects of the organisation of the prosecutions. The islanders complained that the prosecutions were an abuse of process because the content of the law was unascertainable and the legislation governing their trials was retrospective. The abuse of process claims were rejected. There was a mechanism by which islanders could ask the island officials and legal advisers for advice. It was predictable that non-consensual sexual intercourse would be a criminal offence. They were not prejudiced in any way by the late constitution of a criminal justice system. Although some of the decisions made in the Pitcairn case were questionable from a formalist point of view, most were fair in the peculiar circumstances of this small and remote island. The idea of the rule of law and of a fair trial cannot be divorced from the context in which criminal justice decisions are taken.