Abstract
The article examines the issues of theory and practice of compensation for environmental damage, and formulates its concept. Attention is drawn to the features of compensation of harm to the environment in the context of judicial practices, discusses the legal position of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court, the conclusion about inadmissibility of adoption subjects of the Russian Federation normative acts regulating compensation of harm to the environment at rates and methods. The conclusion that harm to human life, health and property caused by the negative impact of the environment (secondary or ecogenic harm) can be compensated in three different ways: insurance; in court; in public.
Highlights
Возмещение экологического вреда является одним из важнейших межотраслевых институтов, включающих нормы гражданского и экологического права
The article examines the issues of theory and practice of compensation
Attention is drawn to the features of compensation
Summary
Возмещение экологического вреда является одним из важнейших межотраслевых институтов, включающих нормы гражданского и экологического права. Представляется, что экологический вред может проявляться как в причинении вреда окружающей среде, так и жизни, здоровью или имуществу граждан (имуществу юридического лица).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
