Legal Principles of Interaction between Local Self-Government Bodies and the National Police in the Field of Protecting Cultural Heritage in Terms of Martial Law

Problem setting. Executive authorities and local self-government bodies in Ukraine take part in the development and implementation of regional targeted programs aimed at the development of respective territories. While elaborating the programs, they apply the regulatory framework determining the principles of development, approval and implementation of state targeted programs, that does not reflect the specificity of regional programs, territorial community programs. Project management methodology constitutes one of the most efficient regional development tools that are almost not used in the development of regional targeted programs. To ensure efficient management of cultural heritage protection, attention should be paid to the development and further implementation of regional targeted programs, with due account of the project approach methodology. Recent research and publications analysis. The studies of the project approach application for solving development tasks at different levels of public administration have been performed by Т. Mamatova, О. Medvedieva, V. Rach, І. Chykarenko, and others. Analytical study of cultural heritage management as well as specific aspects of program analysis has been made within the project “ReHERIT: Shared Responsibility for Common Heritage” and project “CHOICE: Cultural Heritage and Contemporaneity”. Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. In spite of the researcher’s interest in the selected range of problems, the issue of program development in the field of cultural heritage with due account of the project approach remains understudied. Paper main body. According to the data of the analysis made, as of the beginning of 2021 comprehensive cultural heritage preservation programs are being implemented in 10 regions of Ukraine. In 12 more regions activities (program section, specific activities or projects) aimed to preserve cultural heritage, fixed in the cultural development or economic and social development programs are being implemented. Kyiv and Luhansk regions (government-controlled territory of Ukraine) have not approved regional programs regulating the field of cultural heritage protection. The results of program analysis have pointed to problems in the development and protection of cultural heritage, that have been grouped by different aspects. Problems indicated in most programs are of descriptive nature, characterize the situation as of the moment of development, with no account of the trends over a certain period of time, are not always supported by actual statistical, financial, and other indicators. Analysis of regional programs under implementation has shown that some of them contain general wording, goals, are characterized by the lack of logical correlation between directions and problems. Availability of respective resource provision constitutes the necessary precondition for the achievement of the goal and expected outcomes of programs. Under the decisions “On the Regional Budget for 2021”, as far as allocation of the regional budget costs for the implementation of local/regional programs is concerned, regional councils have approved funding for the implementation of 4 programs (out of 10 comprehensive ones), the activities of which are aimed at the cultural heritage preservation. Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Implementation of the project approach in the development and implementation of regional targeted programs will enable to more efficiently and rationally use budget funds and involve budget and non-budget funding based on the outcomes planned and complying with the state and regional policy priorities. Unified principles and approaches are not followed in the development of regional programs. In order to improve the efficiency of program implementation it is necessary to take into account mutual relations between program components, adequacy of the goal, tasks, and final outcomes in the course of their development.

У світовій практиці склалася традиція, згідно з якою основним суб’єктом у сфері охорони культурної спадщини є органи публічної влади – державні спеціалізовані органи й установи та органи місцевого самоврядування. Водночас нині все більшу роль у справі збереження культурного надбання людства відіграють неурядові інституції – громадські об’єднання та окремі небайдужі громадяни. Відповідні об’єднання та громадяни досить активно діють у багатьох державах світу, а їхній правовий статус визначається як на рівні національного законодавства, так і поступово стає предметом регулювання міжнародного права.
 Метою статті є аналіз національного законодавства, яким урегульовано діяльність громадських об’єднань та окремих громадян у сфері охорони культурної спадщини України.
 Наукова новизна полягає у виокремленні й аналізі правового забезпечення діяльності громадських об’єднань та окремих громадян як окремих важливих суб’єктів у сфері охорони культурної спадщини України.
 Висновки. Аналіз світової практики у сфері захисту культурної спадщини свідчить про активне залучення до цього процесу громадських об’єднань та окремих небайдужих громадян. Україна також має давні традиції залучення громадськості до пам’яткоохоронної діяльності. Необхідна правова основа такої діяльності була закладена ще в радянський період, а нині гарантована Конституцією України та нормами як загального, так і спеціального законодавства. Серед найпотужніших профільних громадських організацій слід відзначити багаторічну роботу Українського товариства охорони пам’яток історії та культури, правовий статус якого визначено Законом України «Про охорону культурної спадщини» та власним статутом. Серед міжнародних пам’яткоохоронних громадських організацій, які провадять роботу в нашій державі, виділяються Український національний комітет Міжнародної ради з питань пам’яток і визначних місць та Український комітет ради музеїв «ІКОМ», які діють відповідно до норм міжнародного права та українського законодавства, зокрема Закону України «Про громадські об’єднання», а також власних статутів. Крім того, національне законодавство надає право окремим громадянам долучатися до пам’яткоохоронної діяльності на правах громадських інспекторів, проводити громадську експертизу об’єктів культурної спадщини, встановлювати над ними шефство з метою забезпечення їх збереження тощо. У цілому українське законодавство щодо забезпечення права участі громадських організацій та окремих громадян в охороні культурної спадщини відповідає основним міжнародним нормам та поширеній зарубіжній практиці.

Метою статті є аналіз становлення та розвитку пам’яткоохоронного законодавства в Україні.
 Наукова новизна статті полягає в аналізі основних законодавчих і підзаконних актів України, завдяки яким відбулося реформування сфери охорони культурної спадщини в Україні та приведення її у відповідність до міжнародних норм і стандартів.
 Висновки. У законодавчому забезпеченні охорони культурної спадщини України можна до певної міри умовно виділити кілька етапів. Перший розпочався із прийняттям Декларації про державний суверенітет України від 16 липня 1990 р., яка започаткувала зміну державних підходів до культурної спадщини України, задекларувавши культурне відродження українського народу й необхідність повернення національних, культурних та історичних цінностей України, що знаходяться за її межами. Водночас базовим актом стали Основи законодавства України про культуру від 14 лютого 1992 р. Саме Основи законодавства України про культуру визначили правові засади діяльності органів публічної влади у сфері охорони культурної спадщини, а також започаткували процес формування Державного реєстру національного культурного надбання. Конституція України від 28 червня 1996 р. більш послідовно, у порівнянні з Конституцією УРСР, забезпечила гарантії культурних прав громадян та обов’язки держави щодо охорони культурної спадщини. На цьому етапі було ратифіковано ряд міжнародних актів у сфері охорони культурної спадщини, а також прийнято національні законодавчі й підзаконні акти, спрямовані на імплементацію цих норм у національне законодавство України, зокрема Закон України «Про вивезення, ввезення та повернення культурних цінностей» від 21 вересня 1999 р. Другий етап розпочався з ухваленням Закону України «Про охорону культурної спадщини» від 8 червня 2000 р., в якому враховані основні тенденції міжнародно-правового забезпечення охорони культурної спадщини, зокрема положення Конвенції ЮНЕСКО про охорону всесвітньої культурної і природної спадщини 1972 р. Законом урегульовані права та обов’язки суб’єктів охорони культурної спадщини, а також порядок формування Державного реєстру нерухомих пам’яток України за категоріями національного й місцевого значення. На цьому етапі ухвалені й такі важливі нормативні акти, як Закон України «Про охорону археологічної спадщини» від 18 березня 2004 р. і Загальнодержавна програма збереження та використання об’єктів культурної спадщини на 2004–2010 роки, затверджена Законом України від 20 квітня 2004 р. Третій етап розпочався з ухваленням Закону України «Про культуру» від 14 грудня 2010 р. і триває донині. На цьому етапі ухвалено ряд важливих змін до законодавства, спрямованих на приведення українського пам’яткоохоронного законодавства до міжнародних норм і стандартів, зокрема щодо збереження пам’яток культурної спадщини, включених до Списку всесвітньої спадщини ЮНЕСКО.

Метою статті є аналіз французького пам’яткоохоронного законодавства, виявлення його особливостей і формування пропозицій для можливих запозичень у процесі удосконалення правового забезпечення охорони культурної спадщини в Україні.
 Наукова новизна. Акцентовано увагу на базових нормативних актах у сфері охорони культурної спадщини у Франції; відзначено особливості французького пам’яткоохоронного законодавства; розкрито основні засади діяльності французьких інституцій у сфері охорони культурної спадщини; запропоновано шляхи удосконалення законодавчого забезпечення охорони культурної спадщини в Україні на основі запозичення французького досвіду.
 Висновки. Франція вже майже два століття проводить цілеспрямовану державну політику щодо захисту культурної спадщини й удосконалює профільне законодавство, накопичивши у цій сфері величезний досвід. Французький досвід законодавчого забезпечення охорони культурної спадщини є цікавим для України з огляду на схожу модель управління у сфері культури, наявність державного реєстру пам’яток культурної спадщини, політику децентралізації тощо. У контексті удосконалення правового регулювання охорони культурної спадщини в Україні передусім заслуговує на увагу французький досвід кодифікації профільного законодавства. Корисним видається й ухвалення Закону «Про меценатство», який у Франції сприяє залученню приватних коштів на охорону й реставрацію об’єктів культурної спадщини завдяки пільговому оподаткуванню меценатів, а також відзначення меценатів на державному рівні й пропагування меценатської діяльності. У процесі децентралізації в Україні може бути використаний французький досвід передачі пам’яток на місцях органам місцевого самоврядування під загальним контролем держави. Так само необхідні зміни до законодавства для якнайширшого залучення громадськості до процесу охорони культурної спадщини, реалізації громадських ініціатив щодо реставрації пам’яток. Заслуговує на увагу і практика передачі об’єктів культурної спадщини в управління приватним компаніям за умови чіткого дотримання пам’яткоохоронного законодавства і відкритості цих об’єктів для доступу відвідувачів.

Історичний аспект охорони пам’яток культурної спадщини за кордоном та його значення для пам’яткоохоронної галузі України

In the scientific article, the author conducted a scientific study of the theoretical, legal and applied aspects of the application of administrative contracts in the field of cultural heritage protection. The scientific article indicates that the responsibility of local councils and local state administrations includes issues of ensuring the protection of historical and cultural monuments, the preservation and use of cultural heritage, the organization of their protection, restoration and use, including through the conclusion of administrative contracts. In the field of cultural heritage protection, such administrative contracts are concluded with the participation of local public administration bodies as protection contracts for cultural heritage monuments, for newly discovered cultural heritage objects or their parts. The obligatory parties to such contracts are local public administration bodies, individuals or legal entities as owners of monuments, newly discovered cultural heritage objects or their parts, as well as a local public administration body, including a higher level as a subject of ensuring the protection of cultural heritage monuments. An essential condition of administrative agreements concluded in this area is to ensure the preservation of monuments, newly discovered cultural heritage objects or their parts by the owners. In the administrative-legal doctrine, the legal nature of a protection agreement for cultural heritage monuments is defined differently - it is defined as an agreement that has a dual legal nature (private law and public law), as a civil agreement that is characterized by certain features of an administrative agreement, as an administrative agreement that determines the mutual rights and obligations of its participants in the public law sphere. Such a discussion is caused by the lack of a direct definition in the legislation of a protection agreement as administrative, however, in judicial practice such agreements are defined as administrative, including due to the fact that the conclusion of such an agreement occurs instead of the issuance of an individual act of the cultural heritage protection body in cases specified by the law on the protection of cultural heritage. Most often, in judicial practice, in disputes related to the application of protection contracts by local public administration bodies as contracts in the field of cultural heritage protection, issues are resolved regarding the failure of the local public administration body to fulfill the terms of the protection contract and the failure to conclude a protection contract.

The article analyzes the process of forming a complex system of architectural heritage protection in Italy and the evolution of the legal system in the field of cultural heritage preservation. The analysis clarifies the condition of heritage preservation in Italy, allows to trace some trends in its development and follow their successful experience. The issue of the protection and usage of architectural monuments and the analysis of international experience in the field of cultural heritage preservation have not been studied enough in Ukrainian scientific works. The purpose of the article is to reveal the regularities and peculiarities of the history of the formation and development of the cultural heritage protection and usage mechanisms in Italy. Italian cultural policy in the field of cultural and natural heritage protection started forming earlier than in other European countries because of the amount of significant cultural values. Italy has the richest experience in working with architectural heritage. The current state of the studied area in Italy shows the successful approaches and the high-quality management policy, which made it possible to expand the country's tourist potential to the highest level in Europe without threatening the existence of monuments. Italian legislation allowed to expand and streamline cooperation between the government and regions in heritage preservation field. In addition, regions got some autonomy in the field of improving and increasing the value (valorization) of heritage. Public-private partnership in this field and the organization of public-private funds are also an effective attempt of state and private cooperation. The analysis of successful European experience can become a basis for improving the legislative framework of Ukraine in the field of cultural heritage protection and form mechanisms for effective management of architectural monuments, both at the national and regional levels.

The article examines the organisational and legal framework for implementing certain projects of interaction between local self-government bodies and the police under martial law, and identifies the specifics of their financial support. The purpose of the study is to identify promising projects of cooperation between local self-government bodies and the police and other authorities in creating a secure environment and the means of their organisational and economic support. The objectives of the research are to clarify the legal basis and forms of cooperation between local self-government (LSG) bodies and the police in the area of ensuring the vital activity of the region; to identify promising projects of cooperation between local self-government bodies and the police and other bodies in creating a secure environment that have been implemented and are planned for implementation and ways to finance them. The methodological basis of the paper is the dialectical method, the application of which allowed to comprehensively reveal the nature of forms and methods of interaction between local self-government bodies and the police. The study established that the interaction of the National Police of Ukraine with other public security entities during the anti-terrorist operation should be understood as an activity based on legislative and by-law regulations and coordinated in terms of objectives, time and place of conduct between entities directly involved in the fight against terrorism, arising from the organisational activities of specially created coordination bodies, and other equal and independent state bodies, local self-government bodies and the public with the aim of their coordinated functioning to protect the rights, freedoms and security of citizens, prevent and suppress terrorist acts and other offences through the most appropriate combination of forms and methods inherent in these subjects. It is found that, taking into account the analysis of positive foreign experience, it is advisable to develop a model programme of interaction of local self-government bodies at the regional level with the police and other authorities to create a secure environment in Ukraine, which should define: the legal basis for interaction; areas of interaction; forms, means and methods of interaction; and the procedure for joint financing of security programmes of interaction in this area.

Abstract. Introduction. The article examines and analyzes the international features of the protection of monuments of the cultural heritage of the Republic of Lithuania. Formulation of the problem. Every country in the world strives to protect and preserve its cultural heritage as effectively as possible. In the legislation of the vast majority of countries of the world, cultural heritage monuments are divided into three categories: local, national and international (global, world) significance (UNESCO monuments). The latter are inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List by the relevant decision of the said international organization. There are as many countries in the world as there are practices for the protection of their own cultural heritage, its preservation, use and promotion, as well as cooperation with UNESCO in this area. In our opinion, the experience of such a small country as the Republic of Lithuania, which is so small in territory but quite conscious and responsible in the field of monument protection, is very interesting. Goal. To analyze the international features in the field of protection of cultural heritage monuments of the Republic of Lithuania. The research methodology is based on a system of theoretical principles (systematics, historicism, objectivity, etc.), logical methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, analogy, hypothesis, etc.) and specific research tools that provided an opportunity to highlight the international features in the field of cultural heritage protection of the Republic of Lithuania. The main results of the research are the study, analysis, generalization and systematization of the bases of the national monument protection legislation of the Republic of Lithuania, as well as the consideration of Lithuanian cultural heritage monuments in the context of world cultural heritage. The scientific novelty of the research results of the article is the analysis of the international legal norms of the United Nations and UNESCO on the protection of cultural heritage and compliance of the national legislation of the Republic of Lithuania with these norms. Conclusions and specific suggestions of the author. At present, the world has developed a very effective mechanism for preserving cultural heritage. Of course, international monument protection organizations play an important role, but the main work on the protection of monuments still belongs to the national bodies for the cultural heritage protection of specific states, as we can see in the example of the Republic of Lithuania. Therefore, the real protection and preservation of cultural heritage begins with the awareness of people, nations, and society of the fact that in their country there are those monuments that need to be studied, accounted for, protected and preserved as a part of history and culture of the past for future generations.

Formulation of the problem. In modern conditions of decentralization in Ukraine, local authorities receive new rights, powers and responsibilities corresponding the role and functions they are called to perform before the state and the people. Accordingly, the range of management actions they must implement is expanded and updated, which obliges local self-government bodies to pay special attention to the adoption of high-quality and effective decisions within their competence. Analysis of the recent research and publications. Such scientists as I. Ahieieva, V. Adamovska, M. Borovyk, N. Briushkova, L. Vaganova, O. Volkova, M. Ishchenko, O. Karpanasiuk, O. Kovryha, N . Kondratenko, V. Kopytko, G. Krasnova, Ya. Lashchuk, V. Martynenko, N. Makhnachova, O. Nikoliuk, M. Novikova, L. Rodchenko, M. Snitchuk, O. Udovytsa, M. Tsutskiridze, I. Yurichyna and others researched administrative decision- making a lot. Scientists raise the issue of peculiarities of administrative decision-making by local self-government bodies, analyze administrative decisions as a form of implementation of organizational function of public administration, assess the peculiarities of administrative decision-making by public authorities in extreme conditions, etc. Determining parts of the general problem that were not resolved previously. Administrative decision-makingin local self-government bodies remains acutely relevant in modern Ukrainian society, which requires constant in-depth scientific research. The subject of this research is the processes and procedures associated with the peculiarities of administrative decision-making by local self-government bodies in modern conditions. Presentation of the main research material. Making administrative decisions is a complex process, which in general should be considered in two following directions: normative (rational), according to which decisions are made on the basis of defined norms, standards and regulations; behavioral (psychological), in which managers make decisions based on their certainexperience. Administrative decisions in local self-government bodies should be made based on the need to consider them as part of a single administrative process, expediency, reasonableness and rationality, therefore, the model of their rational adoption should be considered. Administrative decision-making is a processе that must be rational, that is, produce the most reasonable decisions even when the managers have minimal resources for their adoption. Accordingly, decision-making procedure must be well thought out and provide an ideal algorithmic sequence for its implementation. In the most general form, the model of rational administrative decision-making in local self-government bodies should include such stages as preparation for the development of an administrative decision, its development, adoption and implementation. Based on the presented model, administrative decision-making in local self- government bodiesis based on the consideration of information, its analysis and summarizing from the point of view of the complexity and unity of the administrative processes. This means that all stages are interconnected by inextricable ties, andin its integrity allowsolving the tasks set before the managers. Currently, there are many problems and unresolved issues forlocal self-government bodiesin the field of administrative decision-making. In order to solve them, it is necessary to take the following steps: improve the process of planning of the activities of local self- government bodies in accordance with the need to improve the staffing; to develop goals and areas of work for local self-government bodies on a scientific basis so that they could work effectively and make informed administrative decisions; along with this, use and implement scientific approaches to organization of purely administrative work when making administrative decisions; to improve the training of personnel responsible for making administrative decisions taking into account the development of modern society; to use innovative technologies and approaches in the process of decision-making in local self-government bodies, as well as use modern softwareactively; to develop criteria for assessing the effectiveness of administrative decision-making by local self-government bodies, which wouldensure the highest quality of the specified process; as a result of the above steps – to improve personnel, material, technical and financial support of local self- government bodies, and bring them to self-sufficiency in their functioning. Conclusions. Administrative decisions in local self-government bodies are made in accordance with the model of their rational adoption, which is based on such stages as preparation for development, development, adoption and implementation of the decisions. Taking into account issues andproblems, which currently exist in the field of administrative decision-making in local self-government bodies,it is necessary to take the steps, implementation of which will enable improvement of the process of administrative decision-making in local self-government bodies and improvement of the quality of life for people.

The article is devoted to the analysis of Ukrainian legislation in the sphere of implementation by local self-government bodies of budgetary powers directly related to information law. The concept, the content of these powers, their implementation in the conditions of martial law are considered. The paper analyzes the criteria by which this concept is defined, and determines the significance of the budgetary powers of local self-government bodies in the field of informatization. As well as the shortcomings faced by these bodies during the implementation of the above-mentioned powers The legal principles on the basis of which the relevant bodies exercise their rights and duties in the researched area have been studied. The impact and changes on the process of implementation of these budgetary powers of local self-government bodies, caused by the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, were studied. It has been clarified what specific researched budgetary powers of information law these bodies have in this or that sphere of public life. The duties of publicizing a certain type of information by local self-government bodies, including information on budgets and their implementation, are considered. Own and delegated powers of local self­government bodies in the field of informatization, including financing of industry programs and projects, are discussed. The issue of the role of local governing bodies in ensuring access to information and the implementation of other aspects of information law at the level of specific local communities is studied. The problems faced by local self-government bodies during the implementation of relevant powers in the field of informatization and their consequences are analyzed. As well as their ability to improve the availability of information to the public. Also, the importance of effective use of budgetary resources for the development of information infrastructure and raising the level of citizens’ awareness was investigated. The legal acts related to the financing of information projects by local bodies are systematized and analyzed, defining their rights and responsibilities in this area. Support for information disclosure through local government media spending, such as the creation and maintenance of websites and online platforms for publicizing official information, is being considered. The content of the legislative norms regulating this sphere has been studied, highlighting the basic rights and duties of local bodies in relation to information policy. As well as the practice of local bodies applying international experience in this field. Attention is drawn not only to the legislative framework regulating these issues, but also to the practical experience of their implementation at various levels of local self-government. In particular, the article examines the mechanisms of the formation and use of budget funds to ensure the information needs of citizens, the development of information infrastructure on the ground, as well as control over the expenditure of budget funds in this area. The article analyzes the practical experience of local bodies regarding the implementation of projects to improve the availability of information. Attention is also paid to mechanisms for using budgetary resources to create and maintain information resources, such as various websites, appropriate infrastructure for information dissemination, etc. On the basis of the researched materials, namely, current legislation, scientific articles and other resources, the main aspects of advantages and significance, problems and directions of implementation by local self-government bodies in the field of information law were defined and outlined. This article highlights the functioning mechanisms of local self-government in the conditions of a modern information society and can be useful for all those interested in the development of local democracy and the construction of a society in which information transparency will prevail, that is, information transparency of the subjects of this sphere.

This article analyses the practical experience of the formation and functioning of regional public structures in the field of the cultural heritage protection in Russia in the late nineteenth — early twentieth centuries. The author focuses on the activity of the Ural Society of Natural Science Lovers (Ekaterinburg) and its special commissions (protection of archaeological and natural sites). The relevance of the study is due to the growing role of public organisations in cultural heritage protection. The works of the Ural Society of Natural Science Lovers provide valuable experience in organising a public initiative for the preservation of ancient heritage in regions that do not have a high concentration of scientific and higher education institutions. To analyse the material, the author uses procedural and historical-anthropological methods. The research refers to unpublished office documents (minutes of meetings, official correspondence) from the collection of the State Archive of Sverdlovsk Region and printed materials (minutes of meetings, reports) from Zapiski Ural’skogo Obshchestva Lyubiteley Yestestvoznaniya. An analysis of historiography and sources demonstrates that until the end of the nineteenth century, the main efforts of the Ural Society of Natural Science Lovers in the field of archaeological heritage protection of the Ural region were associated with the identification and museumification of such objects. The activities significantly changed in the 1890s–1910s. Specialised commissions were created within the structure of the society. They focused on the implementation of measures to preserve archaeological sites. At the same time, the Commission for the Protection of Natural Monuments paid considerable attention to the protection of natural objects with cultural layers (Kamennye Palatki in Shartash, etc.). An important condition for effective heritage protection was the interaction of the Ural Society of Natural History Lovers with state (central and local) and municipal bodies, and private individuals. A special relationship developed with the Imperial Archaeological Commission, which often directed the society’s activities in the field of cultural heritage protection.

The book entitled New Trends in the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage is a collection of twelve scientific articles (chapters) authored by Polish and foreign researchers in the field of cultural heritage protection. Specializing in various scientific disciplines (including legal, architectural, managerial, cultural studies considerations) and at different stages of scientific development, the authors of the individual texts from either a casuistic (case studies) or systemic (studies of normative solutions or development trends) perspective analyze “new trends” in the protection of cultural and natural heritage. “The Scientific Editors of the monograph have managed to gather a group of competent Authors, both domestic and foreign [...] Here we have specialists in philosophy, biology, management sciences and, for the most part, lawyers, paring various specific legal sciences, and interested in the issues of cultural and natural heritage and its protection. So, it can be concluded that the monograph submitted for review has an interdisciplinary character, both in the so-called ‘external aspect’ and ‘internal’, within the framework of legal sciences themselves [...] The reviewed scientific monograph is a fairly comprehensive collection of studies related to the issues of protection of natural and cultural heritage.” From the review of Dr. hab. Bolesław Maciej Ćwiertniak, Professor of the “Humanitas” Higher School in Sosnowiec

The urgency of the issue is determined by two parallel reforms taking place in our country: the reform of the law-enforcement system and the reform of the system of local self-government, aimed at the substantial extension of the rights of territorial communities. The article deals with the legal regulation of the interaction of territorial subdivisions of the National police with local self-government bodies in the field of ensuring public security and order. A particular attention is paid to co-operation with crime prevention and joint prevention plans, since security is one of the basic human needs, and police and community cooperation is the best way to provide it. Analyzing the legislation of Ukraine, which partially defines the interaction of the territorial bodies of the National police and local self-government in the field of public security and order, the author notes that they are talking about different forms of interaction, however, there is no procedure that would include a mechanism for implementation of such interaction. The proper organization of interaction between law enforcement bodies and local self-government bodies is possible due to the legislative consolidation of the Procedure of interaction between the National police and local self-government bodies in the field of public security and order security. It will allow the concerted actions of different actors to be achieved, unite and maximize their efforts and opportunities in the protection of public safety and order, avoid duplication of functions, and involve more people in preventive work. According to the results of the study, a drafting and an approval of the Regulations on the interaction of territorial subdivisions of the National police with local self-government bodies in the field of public security and order provision are proposed.

Обґрунтовано необхідність ефективного державного сприяння розвитку освіти у сфері фізичної культури як важливого фактора формування і розвитку фізичного, психічного, соціального та духовного здоров’я суспільства та його членів. Проаналізовано систему взаємовідносин між органами виконавчої влади, органами місцевого самоврядування, організаціями фізкультурно-спортивної спрямованості щодо розвитку освіти у сфері фізичної культури шляхом поліпшення її організаційного, нормативно-правового, кадрового, матеріально-технічного, фінансового, наукового, медичного, інформаційного забезпечення. Узагальнено концептуальні засади структурно-функціональної моделі узгодження державних політик щодо сприяння розвитку освіти у сфері фізичної культури.