Abstract
Abstract This chapter outlines an approach to legal history that regards historical analysis as one mode of critical analysis of law, along with other modes of ‘interdisciplinary’ analysis (economical, philosophical, sociological, literary, etc.) and ‘doctrinal’ analysis. In this way, legal history plays a key role in the general effort to move beyond the long-standing and rhetorically useful, but ultimately unproductive, distinction between ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ legal scholarship, and that between ‘common law’ and ‘civil law’ scholarship. According to this view of legal history, it is a mode of jurisprudence rather than a subspeciality of law or a form of applied history.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.