Abstract

To carry out an analysis of leg movement activity during sleep in a polysomnography dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in comparison to idiopathic restless legs syndrome (iRLS) and healthy controls. In this cross-sectional, observational, instrumental study, 57 patients (males/females: 11/46; mean age 46.2 ± 10.2 years) with a diagnosis of MS underwent a telephone interview assessing the 5 standard diagnostic criteria for RLS and polysomnography. Sleep architecture and leg movement activity during sleep were subsequently compared: 1) 40 patients with MS without RLS (MS-RLS) vs 28 healthy controls; 2) 17 patients with MS with RLS (MS+RLS) vs 35 patients with iRLS; 3) MS+RLS vs MS-RLS. MS-RLS and MS+RLS presented increased sleep latency, percentage of sleep stage N1, and reduced total sleep time compared to healthy controls and iRLS, respectively. The periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS) index was higher in MS-RLS than in healthy controls (P = .035) and lower in MS+RLS compared to iRLS (P = .024). PLMS in MS+RLS were less periodic, less often bilateral, and with shorter single movements compared to the typical PLMS in iRLS. MS is a risk factor for RLS, PLMS, and for a lower sleep quality in comparison to healthy patients. PLMS in MS+RLS are fewer and shorter if compared to iRLS. Our results suggest a dissociation between motor (PLMS) and sensory symptoms (RLS sensory component) in RLS secondary to MS, with possible treatment implications. Ferri R, Sparasci D, Castelnovo A, etal. Leg movement activity during sleep in multiple sclerosis with and without restless legs syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):11-20.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.