Abstract

This work aimed to understand the sensorimotor processes used by humans when learning how to manipulate a virtual model of locomotor dynamics. Prior research shows that when interacting with novel dynamics humans develop internal models that map neural commands to limb motion and vice versa. Whether this can be extrapolated to locomotor rehabilitation, a continuous and rhythmic activity that involves dynamically complex interactions, is unknown. In this case, humans could default to model-free strategies. These competing hypotheses were tested with a novel interactive locomotor simulator that reproduced the dynamics of hemiparetic gait. A group of 16 healthy subjects practiced using a small robotic manipulandum to alter the gait of a virtual patient (VP) that had an asymmetric locomotor pattern modeled after stroke survivors. The point of interaction was the ankle of the VP’s affected leg, and the goal was to make the VP’s gait symmetric. Internal model formation was probed with unexpected force channels and null force fields. Generalization was assessed by changing the target locomotor pattern and comparing outcomes with a second group of 10 naive subjects who did not practice the initial symmetric target pattern. Results supported the internal model hypothesis with aftereffects and generalization of manipulation skill. Internal models demonstrated refinements that capitalized on the natural pendular dynamics of human locomotion. This work shows that despite the complex interactive dynamics involved in shaping locomotor patterns, humans nevertheless develop and use internal models that are refined with experience.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study aimed to understand how humans manipulate the physics of locomotion, a common task for physical therapists during locomotor rehabilitation. To achieve this aim, a novel locomotor simulator was developed that allowed participants to feel like they were manipulating the leg of a miniature virtual stroke survivor walking on a treadmill. As participants practiced improving the simulated patient’s gait, they developed generalizable internal models that capitalized on the natural pendular dynamics of locomotion.

Highlights

  • Locomotor impairments are a significant contributor to disability, comorbidities, diminished self-care, and loss of selfreliance, and their prevalence is increasing in the global aging population (Satariano et al 2012)

  • For the initial null-dynamics/healthy target practice (NDH1– NDH4), subjects improved their tracking, as the RM ANOVA revealed a main effect of time (F[4, 60] ϭ 39.6, P Ͻ 0.001)

  • Error quickly decreased by the end of the first stroke-dynamics/healthy target practice block (RM ANOVA for IDH trials: F[4, 60] ϭ 7.7, P Ͻ 0.001; pairwise comparison for IDH1 Early vs. IDH2: P Ͻ 0.05) but did not exhibit further decreases after that

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Locomotor impairments are a significant contributor to disability, comorbidities, diminished self-care, and loss of selfreliance, and their prevalence is increasing in the global aging population (Satariano et al 2012). Rehabilitation outcomes are multifactorial and often positive, a significant percentage of patients retain locomotor impairments after locomotor training (e.g., see reviews by Belda-Lois et al 2011; Díaz et al 2011; Louie et al 2015; Nam et al 2017; Pennycott et al 2012; Schaechter 2004). The complementary question remains largely unanswered: how do therapists learn to manipulate patient locomotor patterns? This question can be reframed in terms of motor adaptation: how does a human learn to interact with and manipulate the moving leg of a patient, while at the same time compensating for the high dynamical complexity afforded by linked-segmental dynamics under external and possibly pathological neuromuscular control? The complementary question remains largely unanswered: how do therapists learn to manipulate patient locomotor patterns? This question can be reframed in terms of motor adaptation: how does a human learn to interact with and manipulate the moving leg of a patient, while at the same time compensating for the high dynamical complexity afforded by linked-segmental dynamics under external and possibly pathological neuromuscular control?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.