Abstract

The most important models of alphabetic literacy acquisition are presented as general models of learning to read in alphabetic orthographies. The models are, however, typically based on research concerning the acquisition of a single orthography, that of English. This bias is, of course, not the fault of the scholars working in the English-speaking countries, where cognitive psycholinguistics and research in reading acquisition have a long and fine tradition. However, it reflects the fact that the question of orthographic differences in reading acquisition in alphabetic orthographies has been out of the focus of research, and when the question has been addressed, the implicit assumption has been that the non-English findings are somehow less universal than the findings concerning the English orthography.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.