Abstract
Summary Undergraduate college students were tested to an arbitrary learning criterion on two-trial learning set formations. Results showed significantly easier acquisition of two-trial response-perseveration learning set to reinforced cues and two-trial response-shift learning set to nonreinforced cues than for two-trial response-perseveration learning set to nonreinforced cues and two-trial response-shift learning set to reinforced cues. Additional results showed that the subjects, after learning, had learned to approach or to avoid either reinforced or nonreinforced stimuli actually manipulated on the initial trials of each problem. These results were compared to the results of similar tests using infrahuman primates as subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
