Abstract

In spite of much research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) responses to secondary stakeholders (i.e., social movements, activists, media, civil society and non-governmental organizations), the debate on how companies learn from pressure and collaboration with these societal groups is still open. Building upon stakeholder and knowledge management theories, this paper analyzes how secondary stakeholder pressure and embeddedness influence agribusiness companies’ absorptive capacity and their CSR strategies. Data are obtained from 152 Dutch agribusiness company managers. The results highlight that, first, absorptive capacity influences companies’ new product innovation, product positioning and organizational innovation to be more oriented towards CSR. Second, stakeholder embeddedness of agribusiness companies triggers absorptive capacity more than pressure from them. Third, stakeholder pressure and embeddedness also have direct (i.e., not mediated by companies’ absorptive capacity) yet weaker effects on CSR organizational innovation and product positioning. Findings corroborate the idea that firms develop innovative CSR strategies when they combine internal reflection processes and partnerships with secondary stakeholders.

Highlights

  • As agribusiness is closely connected to natural resources, sustainability ranks relatively high on the management agenda in this industry

  • We use ordinary least-squares (OLS) linear regression models that include the simple effects of independent variables

  • The results show in that respect that secondary stakeholder pressure has a significant effect beyond the knowledge effect that is captured by absorptive capacity (0.17, p < 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As agribusiness is closely connected to natural resources, sustainability ranks relatively high on the management agenda in this industry This is true for countries such as The Netherlands that for a long time focused the greater part of agricultural innovations on increasing efficiency, thereby neglecting the sustainability consequences for the natural environment. Managers realize that the challenges underlying the pressure—like climate change, food insecurity and violation of human rights—are often too complex and big to adhere to on their own [10,11]. This requires their organizations to collaborate with stakeholders and to learn from them [12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.