Abstract

Aims The purpose of the study is to evaluate the coverage of the distal tissue defect of long fingers using reversed homodigital island flap and comparison with other flaps. Patients and method It was a retrospective study of 28 cases of reversed homodigital island flap practiced in 28 patients to cover skin finger distal loss. The mean age was 29 years, the sex ratio was 0.17. The variety of à pédicule exclusivement vasculaire was the most used (89%). Partial necrosis of the flap was noticed only in two cases (7%). Six criteria were used to evaluate this coverage: the quality of the flap, the donor site, the neuroma formation, the cold intolerance, the mobility of the finger, and the satisfaction of the patient. A final score for every case was attributed. Results At the middle last follow-up, the results were good in 89% and average in 11%. Conclusion The reversed homodigital island flap is a safe method offering multiple advantages and constitutes an interesting alternative in front of the distal tissue defect of the long finger.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.