Abstract

CEGAR (Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement)-based slicing is one of the most important techniques in reducing the state space in model checking. However, CEGAR-based slicing repeatedly explores the state space handled previously in case a spurious counterexample is found. Inspired by lazy abstraction, we introduce the concept of lazy slicing which eliminates this repeated computation. Lazy slicing is done on-the-fly, and only up to the precision necessary to rule out spurious counterexamples. It identifies a spurious counterexample by concretizing a path fragment other than the full path, which reduces the cost of spurious counterexample decision significantly. Besides, we present an improved over-approximate slicing method to build a more precise slice model. We also provide the proof of the correctness and the termination of lazy slicing, and implement a prototype model checker to verify safety property. Experimental results show that lazy slicing scales to larger systems than CEGAR-based slicing methods.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.