Abstract
Because comparative law as a research field does not have only an external view to law it makes sense to discuss comparative law's relation to other non-national but normatively oriented fields of legal knowledge. Chapter is divided into three thematic areas that are public international law, private international law, and global law. Each section analyses the relation between these fields of law and comparative study of law. The discussion sheds light on the difficulties of combining normative internal and external non-normative view. Difficulties arise from the fact that judicial usage of comparative law as merely an instrument disregards modern pluralist comparative law scholarship. Normatively oriented legal scholarship and non-normative comparative study of have different goals and, as a result, different intellectual styles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
