LATITUDINAL CLINE INDROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERFOR KNOCKDOWN RESISTANCE TO ETHANOL FUMES AND FOR RATES OF RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR FURTHER RESISTANCE

Abstract

We have introduced a device for selecting Drosophila for increased resistance to very high concentrations of ethanol fumes. This device has enabled us to: 1) select quickly and easily over a thousand flies at a time, and 2) score the knockdown time of every fly in the distribution, while causing very little injury to the flies. A sample of nine west coast populations of Drosophila melanogaster showed a significant trend toward higher knockdown resistance in more northern populations. A population's level of knockdown resistance was virtually uncorrelated with its alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) allele frequencies. Five of the above nine populations were then subjected to selection for further knockdown resistance. Each population was divided randomly into four groups of 256 flies: two lines to be selected, and two lines to remain unselected as control lines. In every generation each selected line was measured for knockdown resistance, and the last quartile of flies to be knocked down was saved to continue the selection cycle. Population sizes of the selected and unselected lines were all maintained at 256. Realized heritability, based on the responses to selection of the first four generations, was calculated for each selected line. The five populations were significantly heterogeneous for heritability estimates; the average heritability of the five populations pooled was 0.143 ± 0.019. Over the course of twelve generations, the ten selected lines increased their knockdown times by an average factor of 2.40. Before selection, the five populations were heterogeneous for knockdown resistance, and resistance was greatest among the most northern populations. The amount of change of knockdown resistance over the course of selection was also correlated with latitude: the most southern population increased its knockdown time by a factor of 2.23, and the most northern population increased it by a factor of 2.55. After ten generations of selection, the cline of knockdown resistance was about 4.5 times as steep as that before selection. Small phenotypic differences among populations before selection were thus exaggerated by the action of selection. The differences among populations in their rates of response to selection were attributed to genetic differences that existed before selection. The pattern of change of Adh frequencies over the course of selection was very inconsistent, both among and within populations. From this inconsistency of change of Adh alleles with selection, and the lack of correlation between Adh frequencies and knockdown resistance before selection, we concluded that Adh frequency changes could not have had much effect on the responses of the selected lines.