Abstract
An experiment was carried out to investigate interrelationships between response times (RTs), inspection times (ITs), confidence ratings and success-error measures in concept learning tasks with 2, 4 and 6 values per dimension. On the basis of multiple hypothesis testing assumptions, ordinal predictions were made for high and low confidence RTs and ITs on error and correct trials. As predicted, high confidence RTs were significantly faster than low confidence RTs and, on correct trials, high confidence ITs were significantly faster than low confidence ITs. On error trials, high confidence ITs were (non-significantly) slower than low confidence ITs. Latency curves after the last error changed around the trial on which Ss first expressed high confidence. The latency and success-error results generally replicated previous studies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
