Large Inverted Singlet–Triplet Energy Gaps Are Not Always Favorable for Triplet Harvesting: Vibronic Coupling Drives the (Reverse) Intersystem Crossing in Heptazine Derivatives

Abstract

Heptazine derivatives are promising dopants for electroluminescent devices. Recent studies raised the question whether heptazines exhibit a small regular or an inverted singlet-triplet (IST) gap. It was argued that the S1 ← T1 reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) is a downhill process in IST emitters and therefore does not require thermal activation, thus enabling efficient harvesting of triplet excitons. Rate constants were not determined in these studies. Modeling the excited-state properties of heptazine proves challenging because fluorescence and intersystem crossing (ISC) are symmetry-forbidden in first order. In this work, we present a comprehensive theoretical study of the photophysics of heptazine and its derivative HAP-3MF. The calculations of electronic excitation energies and vibronic coupling matrix elements have been conducted at the density functional theory/multireference configuration interaction (DFT/MRCI) level of theory. We have employed a finite difference approach to determine nonadiabatic couplings and derivatives of spin-orbit coupling and electric dipole transition matrix elements with respect to normal coordinate displacements. Kinetic constants for fluorescence, phosphorescence, internal conversion (IC), ISC, and RISC have been computed in the framework of a static approach. Radiative S1 ↔ S0 transitions borrow intensity mainly from optically bright E' π → π* states, while S1 ↔ T1 (R)ISC is mediated by E″ states of n → π* character. Test calculations show that IST gaps as large as those reported in the literature are counterproductive and slow down the S1 ← T1 RISC process. Using the adiabatic DFT/MRCI singlet-triplet splitting of -0.02 eV, we find vibronically enhanced ISC and RISC to be fast in the heptazine core compound. Nevertheless, its photo- and electroluminescence quantum yields are predicted to be very low because S1 → S0 IC efficiently quenches the luminescence. In contrast, fluorescence, IC, ISC, and RISC proceed at similar time scales in HAP-3MF.