Abstract
It is not clearly known about the limitations of the large-eddy simulation (LES) mode of an atmospheric model (WRF) in predicting the microscale flows for engineering purpose. This study chooses a typical separated turbulent flow past a three-dimensional axisymmetric hill and investigates the performance of WRF-LES in comparison with the popular CFD solver (OpenFOAM). The numerical models and conditions are set similarly between the two codes. The instantaneous visualization shows that both WRF-LES and OpenFOAM-LES can produce the primary flow features, including hairpin vortices, horseshoes, and surface-shear-induced vortices at different scales, with high similarity. Nevertheless, the turbulent kinetic energy in the near wake produced by WRF-LES is underestimated, in comparison with WRF-LES. The energy spectra suggest that WRF-LES using the high-order advection schemes has a stronger capacity of generating and maintaining small-scale turbulent motions than OpenFOAM-LES. Furthermore, the deviation of numerical dissipation behavior is examined between the two solvers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
