Abstract

There is a general consensus that Venezuelan reality has been recurrently interpreted from fatalism or pessimism by the majority of the national intelligentzia . This situation allows to speak of a pessimistic tradition that is traceable from the early stages of the country’s Republican life. The following work gathers, through a documentary research, the main studies that have traced these pessimistic approximations of the national reality from the intellectual discourse, Specifically, a group of researchers is described finding in the contemporary intellectual discourse, a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy of national failure by linking it with the negative self-image of being Venezuelan, problems of national identity and/or recurrent national crisis. This review brings together, mainly, the precursory works of Augusto Mijares (1952) and Luis Beltran Guerrero (1962); as well as, the ones done by Maritza Montero (1991), Thamara Hannot (1996, 1997) and Anibal Romero (2002), who are relevant in the content’s analysis of different texts and describe in detail the pessimistic intellectual discourse that consolidated throughout the 20 th century in Venezuela.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.