Abstract
A case-by-act in forensic psychology is mobbing. With the intention of contributing to the development of existing techniques, LIPT-60 usefulness for the forensic psychological evaluation of mobbing was analysed. A sample of 90 workers, half male and half female, completed LIPT-60 in a feigning design under two conditions: first under standard/reality instructions and then under feigning instructions. The results revealed that the sample was able to feign suffering from mobbing in LIPT-60; they carried out two feigning strategies, suffering exaggeration and indiscriminate grouping of mobbing behaviors; that NEAP’s and IMAP’s cut-off points, suggested for suspected feigning, are not validfor forensic practice; and that there were no feigning differences based on gender. Implications for forensic practice are discussed in this study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
