Abstract
This study proposes to evaluate the efficacy of feminist criticism since it established its original programme in resistance to a critical and canonical tradition ruled by phallic « universals ». Whilst my reading recognizes the incisiveness of the new tools, especially in the concept of « gender », it regrets the loss of critical power resulting from a textual practice based around what has to appear as a reactionary, reflectionist and subjectivist aesthetics. Relying on a set of myths (feminist Fables, mother-theories, mother-texts), it inverts, therefore fails to subvert, the fundamental tropes of patriarchal discourse.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.