Abstract

This article considers the content, reception, and relevance of Louis Charlier's Essai sur le probleme theologique (1938). The core theme of this essay is both the nature and methodology of theology. In this respect, Charlier is participating in the theological selfreflection of the 1930's and 1940's. He opposed the strict Roman Neoscholasticism and pleaded for the full integration of history within theology. Together with M.-D. Chenu he is to be considered as the instigator of a thomistic ressourcement, characterized by a plea for an open thomism. This first phase of the nouvelle theologie (new theology) was followed by a second phase, a theological ressourcement, which pleads for a full return of theology to its sources (Bible, Fathers, liturgy) on the foundations of the first phase. During this second phase too (ca. 1942-1950), there were some positive but, more often, negative critiques on Charlier's Essai. Both the Essai of Charlier and Une ecole de theologie: le Saulchoir of Chenu (1937) aroused Roman irritation and in 1942 were placed on the Index.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.