Abstract
A Kuznets curve, based upon GDP and population estimates for the years 1969 through 2007 from 36 nations and regions comprising the entire global economy and population, has been previously demonstrated. This global Kuznets curve of income inequality was a mathematical consequence of the definition of income inequality used (the coefficient of variation, which is the standard deviation divided by the mean) and two observations; the standard deviation of population-weighted national/regional mean per capita income increased linearly, and the mean global per capita income increased exponentially over the period investigated. In this analysis, these same 36 nations/regions were stratified into three groups based upon their 1969 mean per capita income to determine if those observations were also applicable to this subgroup analysis. This study demonstrated that between 1969 and 2007, population-weighed income inequality actually increased in the two richest groups and decreased in the poorest group. This observation was primarily produced by the finding that the exponential rate of growth of the population-weighted mean per capita income in the poorest group was nearly twice that of the two richest groups. This finding suggests that Kuznets hypothesis that increasing income inequality was an early feature of economic development and that decreasing income inequality was a late feature of economic development is not applicable to a global economy stratified on the basis of mean per capita income.
Highlights
Kuznets [1] hypothesized that national economic development was associated initially with increasing income inequality followed by decreasing income inequality, which describes the distinctive inverted U shape Kuznets curve
It was suggested that this global Kuznets curve of income inequality was a mathematical consequence of the definition of income inequality used and two observations; the standard deviation of population-weighted national/regional mean per capita income was increasing linearly, and the mean global per capita income was increasing exponentially [9]
That global between-nation/region Kuznets curve showed initial increasing income inequality followed by decreasing income inequality [9] as was hypothesized by Kuznets [1] and associated with global economic development
Summary
Kuznets [1] hypothesized that national economic development was associated initially with increasing income inequality followed by decreasing income inequality, which describes the distinctive inverted U shape Kuznets curve. Kuznets curves have only been variably found within nations and regions [2,3,4,5,6]. Using population and GDP data from 1969 through 2007 from 36 nations and regions that comprised the entire global economy, a global. It was suggested that this global Kuznets curve of income inequality was a mathematical consequence of the definition of income inequality used (the coefficient of variation) and two observations; the standard deviation of population-weighted national/regional mean per capita income was increasing linearly, and the mean global per capita income was increasing exponentially [9]. We sought to determine whether those observations regarding the production of the global Kuznets curve would exist if the global economy were stratified on the basis of mean per capita income
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
