Translate 
Abstract
ABSTRACT I argue in this paper against the orthodox view that knowledge entails belief. Granting that Radford's Unconfident examinee fails as a counterexample, this paper argues that the orthodox view faces another set of counterexamples that are importantly different from Radford’s: cases wherein knowledge that p and belief that not-p are compossible.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
