Abstract

In order to know how to change one must be able to acknowledge what one does not know. The curriculum cannot be decolonised if those who manage its very problematic existence do not know, understand, or exhibit an inclination towards what needs to be transformed and what needs to be decolonised. This is because no effort is then made to acquire the necessary skills, approaches or knowledge. Central to knowledge production of relevance is the development of a critical consciousness and a recognition that education is politics, where the decolonisation process is imagined, whilst being cognisant of the purpose of and approach to knowledge. Ideologies, pedagogy and societal visions are then shaped because change and adaptation are necessary for survival and relevance. This paper examines these issues by referencing personal experiences during the #FMF protests at the University of Pretoria (UP) and the flowering of intellectualism which has been aborted in many instances by a corporate university that seeks subservience and sycophancy through processes such as gatekeeping. Often, the intellectual response has been silence, claiming ‘we are transforming,’ but this is questionable. A robust intellectual project should be in defence of human dignity where the politics of disposability is not entertained.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.