Abstract

Kinematic space can be used as an intermediate step in the AdS/CFT dictionary and lends itself naturally to the description of diffeomorphism invariant quantities. From the bulk it has been defined as the space of boundary anchored geodesics, and from the boundary as the space of pairs of CFT points. When the bulk is not globally AdS3 the appearance of non-minimal geodesics leads to ambiguities in these definitions. In this work conical defect spacetimes are considered as an example where non-minimal geodesics are common. From the bulk it is found that the conical defect kinematic space can be obtained from the AdS3 kinematic space by the same quotient under which one obtains the defect from AdS3. The resulting kinematic space is one of many equivalent fundamental regions. From the boundary the conical defect kinematic space can be determined by breaking up OPE blocks into contributions from individual bulk geodesics. A duality is established between partial OPE blocks and bulk fields integrated over individual geodesics, minimal or non-minimal.

Highlights

  • Invariant [11, 12]

  • In this paper we have shown that the kinematic space for a constant time slice of a static conical defect spacetime is a quotient of the kinematic space for time slices of pure AdS3

  • From the bulk our results were derived from the original differential entropy prescription, and by studying how the quotient acts on geodesics

Read more

Summary

Kinematic space from the bulk

We focus on static conical defect spacetimes and consider the kinematic space for a constant time slice. We show that the differential entropy approach [8], and the quotient approach [22] produce different fundamental regions of the same kinematic space, but are entirely equivalent

Review of geometries
Kinematic space from differential entropy
Kinematic space from boundary anchored geodesics
Kinematic space metric from conformal symmetry
OPE blocks
CFT dual to conical defects
Partial OPE block decomposition
Partial OPE block Casimir equations
Discussion
Duality between OPE blocks and geodesic integrals of bulk fields
Future directions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.