Kinematic and muscle force asymmetry in healthy runners: How do different methods measure up?

Abstract

BackgroundComparing the performance of one leg to another is a common means of assessing running gait to help inform clinical management strategies. Various methods are employed to quantify asymmetries between limbs. However, limited data is available describing the amount of asymmetry that may be expected during running and no index has been identified as preferable for making a clinical determination of asymmetry. Therefore, this study aimed to describe amounts of asymmetry in collegiate cross-country runners and compare different methods of calculating asymmetry. Research questionWhat can be expected as a normal amount of asymmetry in biomechanical variables in healthy runners when using different indices to quantify limb symmetry? MethodsSixty-three (29 male and 34 female) runners participated. Running mechanics were assessed during overground running using 3D motion capture and a musculoskeletal model using static optimization to estimate muscle forces. Independent t-tests were utilized to determine statistical differences in variables between legs. Different methods of quantifying asymmetry were then compared to statistical differences between limbs to determine cut-off values and the sensitivity and specificity of each method. ResultsA large portion of runners demonstrated asymmetry during running. Kinematic variables can be expected to have small differences (2–3 degrees) between limbs while muscle forces may show greater amounts of asymmetry. The sensitivities and specificities for each method of calculating asymmetry were similar, however, different methods led to different cut-off values for each variable investigated. SignificanceAsymmetry can be expected between limbs during running. However, when assessing asymmetry, practitioners should consider the joint, variable, and method of calculating asymmetry when determining differences between limbs.