Abstract
The study concerns the linguistic form in which the elements of an action are captured in the process of criminalization. One of the problems raised in this context is the use of colloquial language and the degree to which this way of formulating elements of crimes ensures the clarity of the description of prohibited acts. This is particularly important for the implementation of the guarantee function of criminal law. The author attempts to define a legislative technique that would ensure the protection of individuals against arbitrary interpretation of the provisions of criminal law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
