Abstract

This article is based on a research conducted to find out (1) D-II PGSD students' level ofability in solving elementary school mathematical problems (D-II PGSD is a course program train­ ing elementary school teachers of mathematics), (2) the func­ tional correlation between their motivation for achievement as well as their experience (which covers former high school, length of time in teaching at elementary school, and frequency in at­ tending upgrading sessions) and their level ofability in solving elementary school mathematical problems, and (3) the contribu­ tion given bytheir motivation for achievement together with their experience to their level ofability in solving elementary school mathematical problems. From the total population of 135 students ofD-II PGSD in the academic year of2000/200 1, a sample consisting ofsixty-six students was taken by means ofsimple random sampling. A ques­ tionnaire and a test were administered to obtain the data, on which zero order correlation, partial correlation, and multiple regres­ .sion analyses were conducted It was found that they w(lre able to solve 73.4% of all the elementary school matheplatical problems presented, an achieve­ ment categorized poor because they were formally considered elementary schooI teacher candidates. The percentage found for their motivation for achievement was 70.5%, which was catego­ rized good. They were categorized low in experience in the aca­ demic year of2000/200I and the average percentage oftheir ex­ perience was 59.06%. The results of the zero order and partial correlation analyses showed that there was a positive and sig­ nificant correlation between their motivation for achievement as well as their experience and their level of ability in solving elementary school mathematical problems (r = 0.6415, r,l.x2 = 0.5047, ryx2 =0.7356, and r yx2 =0.6472). The multiple regres­ sion analysis showed that there was a positive and significant . X1 correlation between their motivation for achievement and their .. experience simultaneously and their level of ability in solving elementary school mathematical problems c:r = 3.0345 + 0.182 X1+ 0.35 X2). The two independent variables could explain 65.80% of the variance of their level of ability in solving elementary school mathematical problems and the effective contributions were respectively 22.23% and 43.56:Yo

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.