Abstract

The germ tube burst method (GTBM) was employed to examine karyotypes of 33 Fusarium species representative of 11 species complexes that span the phylogenetic breadth of the genus. The karyotypes revealed that the nucleolar organizing region (NOR), which includes the ribosomal rDNA region, was telomeric in the species where it was discernible. Variable karyotypes were detected in eight species due to variation in numbers of putative core and/or supernumerary chromosomes. The putative core chromosome number (CN) was most variable in the F. solani (CN = 9–12) and F buharicum (CN = 9+1 and 18–20) species complexes. Quantitative real-time PCR and genome sequence analysis rejected the hypothesis that the latter variation in CN was due to diploidization. The core CN in six other species complexes where two or more karyotypes were obtained was less variable or fixed. Karyotypes of 10 species in the sambucinum species complex, which is the most derived lineage of Fusarium, revealed that members of this complex possess the lowest CN in the genus. When viewed in context of the species phylogeny, karyotype evolution in Fusarium appears to have been dominated by a reduction in core CN in five closely related complexes that share a most recent common ancestor (tricinctum and incarnatum-equiseti CN = 8–9, chlamydosporum CN = 8, heterosporum CN = 7, sambucinum CN = 4–5) but not in the sister to these complexes (nisikadoi CN = 11, oxysporum CN = 11 and fujikuroi CN = 10–12). CN stability is best illustrated by the F sambucinum subclade, where the only changes observed since it diverged from other fusaria appear to have involved two independent putative telomere to telomere fusions that reduced the core CN from five to four, once each in the sambucinum and graminearum subclades. Results of the present study indicate a core CN of 4 may be fixed in the latter subclade, which is further distinguished by the absence of putative supernumerary chromosomes. Karyotyping of fusaria in the not too distant future will be done by whole-genome sequencing such that each scaffold represents a complete chromosome from telomere to telomere. The CN data presented here should be of value to assist such full genome assembling.

Highlights

  • The genus Fusarium contains over 300 phylogenetically distinct species that occupy a broad array of ecological niches worldwide (Aoki et al 2014)

  • Phylogenies inferred for the 104 fusaria comprising the in-group were rooted on sequences of Neonectria and,O\RQHFWULD based on more inclusive analyses (O’Donnell et al )RUW\VL[ RI WKH QRGHV UHFHLYHG • 0/%603%6 VXSSRUW LGHQWL¿HG E\ WKLFNHQHG EODFN QRGHV including representatives of 20 species complexes that were strongly supported as monophyletic

  • We used the germ tube burst method (GTBM) to karyotype 44 strains comprising 33 Fusarium species, and these included representatives of 11 species complexes that spanned the phylogenetic breadth of the genus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genus Fusarium contains over 300 phylogenetically distinct species that occupy a broad array of ecological niches worldwide (Aoki et al 2014). Many of these species are plant pathogens, causing serious diseases on agriculturally, horticulturally and silviculturally important plants, notably F. graminearum and F. oxysporum, which are ranked among WKH WRS ¿YH SODQW SDWKRJHQLF IXQJL ZRUOGZLGH 'HDQ et al 2012). In contrast to most other mycotic agents, fusaria are broadly resistant to the spectrum of antifungals currently available (Guarro 2013, AlHatmi et al 2016) Given their global impact on agriculture, and human and veterinary medicine, two web-accessible DNA sequence databases were constructed to facilitate strain typing via the internet: FUSARIUM-ID Given their global impact on agriculture, and human and veterinary medicine, two web-accessible DNA sequence databases were constructed to facilitate strain typing via the internet: FUSARIUM-ID (http://isolate. fusariumdb.org/; Geiser et al 2004) and Fusarium MLST (http://www.westerdijkinstitute.nl/fusarium/; O’Donnell et al 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.