Karpin and Hilmer: classic cases of ‘It seemed like a good idea at the time’

Abstract

This paper pursues a line of critique that was put forward by Cooksey and Gates (1995a,b). Our approach reviews, critically, the recent reports of Karpin and Hilmer. In particular we examine some of the basic assumptions underlying the approaches taken in these reports with specific emphasis on contemporary human resource management theory. We first explore the conditions under which these reports were generated and how these conditions may have impacted on report recommendations. In addition this exploration points to significant difficulties with the quality of the reports themselves. We then examine the lack of critical attention given by the reports to the vagaries of the 'human condition' which are complex and unpredictable and which tend to lead the reports to produce overly simplistic and unrealistic recommendations and expectations for business. Finally, the implications for SMEs are considered.